首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Incorporation of Ethics and Societal Impact Issues into Senior Capstone Design Courses: Results of a National Survey
【24h】

Incorporation of Ethics and Societal Impact Issues into Senior Capstone Design Courses: Results of a National Survey

机译:将道德和社会影响问题纳入高级卡通设计课程:国家调查结果

获取原文

摘要

This paper provides an overview of the ways that ethics and societal impacts (ESI) are taught and assessed in senior capstone design courses by engineering faculty. A national survey was conducted in spring 2016 that asked engineering and computing faculty to report the types of courses where they incorporated ESI. Among the 1216 respondents who incorporated these topics into one or more courses, 486 (40%) indicated that they taught these topics in capstone design across a range of disciplines. The ESI topics taught by over half of the capstone design instructors included: professional practice issues, safety, engineering decisions in the face of uncertainty, and engineering codes of ethics. On average, individuals (n=212) reported using five different methods to teach students about ESI in their capstone courses, most commonly: engineering design projects (70%), in-class discussions (58%), case studies (58%), examples of professional scenarios (57%), and lectures (55%). This range of methods appears to involve the cognitive, affective, social, and psychomotor domains of learning, which has been proposed as providing an effective way to improve ethical reasoning. For assessment of ESI learning, an average of two methods were used per course with a maximum of 8 methods reported; 10% did not assess ESI knowledge. The most commonly used assessment methods were: group-based written assignments (47%), individual reflections (33%), and individual homework assignments graded with a rubric (31%). Instructor satisfaction with the ability to assess the outcomes of societal context and ethics instruction was weakly correlated with the number of assessment methods used (correl. coeff. 0.25). Among all survey respondents 62% believed that undergraduate students in their program learned about ESI via capstone design, the most commonly identified course type. The results of this study indicate that ethical and societal impact issues can be readily incorporated into capstone design courses in any discipline, and provides examples of effective teaching and assessment methods.
机译:本文概述了道德和社会影响(ESI)的方式由工程学院通过高级卡通设计课程进行教学和评估。 2016年春季进行了全国调查,要求工程和计算教师报告他们注册了ESI的课程类型。在将这些主题纳入一个或多个课程的1216名受访者中,486(40%)表示,他们在一系列学科中教导了Capstone设计中的这些主题。超过一半的Capstone设计教师教授的ESI主题包括:专业实践问题,安全,工程决策面临不确定性,以及工程道德规范。平均而言,个人(n = 212)报告使用五种不同的方法教授学生在其Capstone课程中教育ESI,最常见:工程设计项目(70%),课堂讨论(58%),案例研究(58%) ,专业情景的例子(57%)和讲座(55%)。这一系列方法似乎涉及学习的认知,情感,社会和精神电位域,这已经提出了提供改善道德推理的有效方法。为了评估ESI学习,每门课程使用两种方法的平均报告了8种方法; 10%没有评估ESI知识。最常用的评估方法是:基于团体的书面作业(47%),单个反射(33%),以及具有标题(31%)的个人作业分配。对评估社会背景和道德教学结果的能力的教师满意与所使用的评估方法的数量略微相关(CORCREL。COEFF。0.25)。在所有调查受访者中,62%的人认为,本科生在他们的计划中通过Capstone Design学习ESI,最常见的课程类型。该研究的结果表明,道德和社会影响问题可以容易地纳入任何纪律的Capstone设计课程,并提供有效教学和评估方法的例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号