首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >2017 Zone IV Best Paper: Assessment of Long-term Effects of Technology Use in the Engineering Classroom
【24h】

2017 Zone IV Best Paper: Assessment of Long-term Effects of Technology Use in the Engineering Classroom

机译:2017年间截图最佳论文:在工程教室中使用技术使用的长期影响的评估

获取原文

摘要

This paper summarizes a longitudinal study of the effects of instructional technology on learning and knowledge retention. Two very different types of software were introduced to students in an undergraduate mechanics course and the effects of this technology use were assessed a number of different times over a twenty-five week period. The study took place in three sections of an undergraduate mechanics course. Students in one section used a tool-type software. In a second section, students used a content-type software. Students in the third section represented a control group and did not use any software. To ensure the study's validity, demographic data were collected from and compared between each of the three sections and the study was replicated in a subsequent term. Students were assessed immediately following the intervention and five, ten, and twenty-five weeks later. The results of these assessments were compared among groups to determine the effect of the technology use on learning and retention. Results indicated that each of the three groups had very high levels of retention but that there were no differential levels of learning, retention, or long-term retention among the three groups. Students using technology, however, were able to solve a greater number of problems during the special session than those working by hand. It was thus concluded that instructional technology can make the educational process more efficient without hindering learning or long-term knowledge retention.
机译:本文总结了教学技术对学习和知识保留的影响的纵向研究。在本科机械过程中向学生引入了两种不同类型的软件,并在二十五周内评估了这项技术使用的影响。该研究发生在本科机械课程的三个部分。一节中的学生使用了一个工具型软件。在第二节中,学生使用内容型软件。第三部分学生代表了一个对照组,并没有使用任何软件。为确保研究的有效性,从三个部分中的每一个之间收集人口统计数据,并在随后的任期中复制该研究。学生在干预后立即评估,五,十,二十五周后。比较这些评估的结果在群体中进行了比较,以确定技术用途对学习和保留的影响。结果表明,三组中的每一个具有很高的保留水平,但三组中没有差异程度的学习,保留或长期保留。然而,使用技术的学生可以在特殊会议期间解决比手工工作的人员更大的问题。因此得出结论,教学技术可以使教育过程能够更有效而不会妨碍学习或长期知识保留。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号