首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >The Ebb and Flow of Engineering Leadership Orientations
【24h】

The Ebb and Flow of Engineering Leadership Orientations

机译:EBB和工程领导方向流动

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The National Academy of Engineering and Engineers Canada have been advocating for engineers to assume greater leadership responsibilities in their workplaces and in society [1, 2], but little is known about how engineers orient themselves toward leadership. A growing body of literature on engineering leadership includes: 1) calls for leadership and professional skill development in faculties of engineering [1-15]; 2) engineering leadership program descriptions written by institutional insiders [16-30]; and 3) applications of traditional leadership theory to engineers' work [31-40]. While this literature presents us with important insights about the rationale for including leadership education in engineering programs, descriptions of the content and pedagogy used by instructors and faculty members beginning to implement these programs, and assessments of engineers' work in relation to managerial leadership theories, very few researchers have stepped back to conceptualize engineering leadership from the perspective of professional engineers. In phase one of our study we attempted to fill this gap by exploring how engineers working in industry thought about leadership, how they characterized leadership exemplars in their profession and how they oriented themselves to professionally relevant conceptions of leadership [41, 42]. After learning that the engineers in our sample overwhelmingly resisted the idea of leadership, we returned to the literature in search of engineering leadership theory, but could only find empirical studies evaluating engineers against leadership frameworks borrowed from the management and psychology literature [6, 31-33, 37-40, 43-46]. Our concern that standards borrowed from other disciplines were among the causes of engineers' resistance to the idea of leadership led us to develop a theory of leadership grounded [47] in the experiences of 45 engineers employed by four Canadian engineering intensive organizations. Through an iterative analytic process, we identified three professionally relevant leadership orientations - Technical Mastery (the "go to" engineer for technical questions), Collaborative Optimization (engineers who build high performing teams) and Organizational Innovation (engineers whose creative ideas drive the company) [41, 42]. Since our preliminary theory was based on the experiences of a small sample of engineers, we developed a survey to test the wider professional resonance of the orientations.
机译:工程工程师加拿大国家科学院一直倡导为工程师在工作场所和社会中[1,2]承担更大的领导责任,但鲜为人知的是,工程师是如何定位自己向领导。文献在工程领导越来越体包括:1)要求在工程学院领导和专业技能发展[1-15]; 2)由机构内部人士书面工程领导节目描述[16-30]; 3)传统的领导理论的应用工程师的工作[31-40]。虽然这些文献给我们提出了关于包括工程项目领导教育的基本原理重要的见解,由导师和教师使用的内容和教学方法的描述开始实施有关管理领导理论这些程序和工程师的工作进行评估,极少数研究人员已经辞去了专业工程师的角度回概念化工程领导。在我们研究的第一阶段,我们试图通过探索工程师行业工作如何思考的领导,他们是如何表征的领导典范在他们的职业,他们如何面向自己的领导的专业相关概念[41,42],以填补这一空白。得知我们的样本中绝大多数的工程师抵制领导的想法后,我们返回到搜索工程领导理论的文献,但只能找到实证研究评估对从管理和心理学文献[6,借来的领导架构工程师31- 33,37-40,43-46]。我们关切的是,从其他学科借用标准是工程师的领导的观念性的原因之一,使我们开发的四个加拿大技术密集型组织采用45名工程师的经验接地领导的理论[47]。经过反复的分析过程中,我们确定了三个专业相关领导取向 - 技术的掌握(下称“进入”工程师技术问题),协同优化(工程师谁打造高绩效团队)和组织创新(工程师,其创意推动公司) [41,42]。由于我们初步的理论是基于工程师的一个小样本的经验,我们开发了一个调查,以测试方向的更广泛的专业共鸣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号