首页> 外文会议>CIGRE Session >Smart Grid through Integrated SCADA System-Karnataka Model - A Case Study
【24h】

Smart Grid through Integrated SCADA System-Karnataka Model - A Case Study

机译:智能电网通过集成SCADA System-Karnataka Model - 以案例研究

获取原文

摘要

It is analyzed that most of the SCADA Networks in India are not complete in its totality. Hence, Smart Grid kind of approach has remained in papers. If some Utilities have EMS SCADA Systems at 400 and 220 kV levels, others have DMS SCADA at 33 and 11 kV levels. There is no State in India except Karnataka, which has a complete SCADA Network from 11 kV level to 400 kV level. I was the Architect of this Network in Karnataka, popularly known as "Karnataka Model" throughout the World. The National Electricity Policy 2003 (India) envisaged some vital requirements in the Utility Networks, consequent to reforms like unbundling of Utilities into Generation, Transmission and Distribution domains like: 1. Adapting Open Access System; 2. Providing Line Flows in real time to Open Access Customer (OAC) and Utility; 3. Making the activities of the Electricity Utility Transparent; 4. Extending ABT Type of Operations down to ESCOMs; 5. Creating Separate Load Despatch Centres to ESCOMs to manage their own Grid; 6. Creating Separate Load Despatch Centres for Transmission Operators; 7. Making Energy Loss calculations at all Voltage levels more automatic. This made Karnataka to go in for a much complex network called Integrated Extended SCADA System in 2008. By then, Karnataka also had EMS SCADA Network in ULDC Scheme of Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd, at 400 and 220 kV Levels only with about 112 Nodes. Following were the constraints: 1) None of the above requirements of NE Policy 2003, could have been fulfilled with the available SCADA System; 2) The Network was not collecting data from the balance 1265 Sub Stations; 3) Implementing Intra State ABT was jeopardised, even though Inter State ABT Worked; 4) There was no mechanism for ESCOMs to monitor and control their consumption; 5) Energy Loss calculations were hay way; 6) None of the EMS functions could be run for want of data from remaining stations; 7) There was no Training Simulator to educate despatchers; 8) OAC mechanism was not automatic; 9) There were serious limitations in the Data Base, which prevented Utilities in Southern Region to add incremental Sub Stations. Therefore, Karnataka had to Sun-Set the existing ULDC Network and established a most versatile Network called "Integrated Extended Scada" Project" (IES) for a total of 1377 Nodes, which ultimately became the biggest Network in the World in 2008. For this, 16 Control Centres were established as follows: 1) One Main Hub having both EMS and DMS; 2) A Disastrous Recovery Hub, 25 kms away from Main Hub, having both EMS & DMS; 3) 5 Control Centres for Distribution Companies; 4) 6 Control Centres for Transmission Zones; 5) A separate Control Centre for Bangalore City Distribution Automation System. Notable features of the Network are: 1) The Complete Network operates with MFTDMA VSATs; 2) 10 MBPs OFC Links are used for ICCP in addition to SCPC VSAT Links; 3) ESCOMs monitor their own Grid; 4) The Network has 31 Remote Man Machine Interfaces for Management Functions; 5) All latest EMS and DMS Functions are operational; 6) The Inter-State and Intra State ABT are fully operational; 7) The Services are SCADA Data, IP Data, Speech, Facsimile and Video Conferencing; 8) The Energy Billing and Energy Audit for all the Companies are automated; 9) OAC mechanism is fully automated; 10) The Network has a Real Time Simulator also; 11) Further to implementing this Network, about 25 Sub Stations are unmanned.
机译:分析了,印度的大多数SCADA网络都不完整。因此,智能电网的方法仍然存在于论文中。如果某些公用事业公司在400和220 kV水平下有EMS SCADA系统,则其他公司在33和11 kV水平下具有DMS SCADA。印度除了卡纳塔卡外,印度没有一个州,它的完整SCADA网络从11 kV水平到400 kV水平。我是Karnataka的这个网络的建筑师,普遍称为“karnataka模型”。 2003年国家电力政策(印度)设想了在公用事业网络中的一些重要要求,从而改革了公用事业的改革,进入了生成,传输和分销领域,如:1。适应开放式访问系统; 2.提供线路实时流动以开放访问客户(OAC)和实用程序; 3.使电力效用透明的活动; 4.向ESCOM扩展到ESCOM的ABT操作类型; 5.创建单独的负载发货中心到勘探器管理自己的网格; 6.为传输运营商创建单独的负载发货中心; 7.在所有电压水平上更加自动地进行能量损失计算。这使Karnataka在2008年前进了一个叫做综合扩展SCADA系统的复杂网络。到那时,Karnataka还在ULDC的ULDC SCADA网络中,在印度有限公司的ULDC Clid Corporation,400和220 kV水平仅适用于112个节点。以下是制约因素:1)上述NE策略2003的上述要求,本可以履行可用的SCADA系统; 2)网络未收集来自余额1265子站的数据; 3)实施境内州ABT被危及,即使际州ABT工作; 4)没有机制是监测和控制其消费的机制; 5)能量损失计算是干草的; 6)没有任何EMS函数可以为剩余站的数据运行; 7)没有培训模拟器教育券; 8)OAC机制不是自动的; 9)数据库存在严重的局限性,防止南部地区的实用程序添加增量子站。因此,Karnataka不得不遮阳地设置现有的ULDC网络,并建立了一个名为“集成扩展SCADA”项目“(IES)的最通用网络(IES),总共有1377码,最终成为2008年世界上最大的网络。为此,16个控制中心建立如下:1)一个主要的集线器,具有EMS和DMS; 2)一个灾难性的恢复中心,距主枢纽25公里,具有EMS&DMS; 3)5个配送公司的控制中心; 4 )6个传输区域的控制中心; 5)班加罗尔市分销自动化系统的单独控制中心。网络的值得注意的特点是:1)完整的网络与MFTDMA VSATS运行; 2)10 Mbps OFC链接除了ICCP到SCPC VSAT链接; 3)ESCOMS监控自己的网格; 4)网络有31个管理功能的远程男性机器接口; 5)所有最新的EMS和DMS功能是可操作的; 6)州间和州间ABT完全运营; 7)服务S是SCADA数据,IP数据,语音,传真和视频会议; 8)所有这些公司的能源计费和能源审计都是自动化的; 9)OAC机制完全自动化; 10)网络也有一个实时模拟器; 11)进一步实施该网络,大约25个子站是无人驾驶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号