【24h】

Game Theory Application for Hydraulic Fracture Design

机译:液压骨折设计的博弈论应用

获取原文

摘要

Today different methods of calculation and software packages to design well activities properly are at the disposal of petroleum engineers. This does not mean that decisionmaking in the oil and gas industry has turned into a routine. The most common problem petroleum engineers face is that reservoir parameters used in these calculations are unknown or unreliable. Thus, very often petroleum engineers have to make decisions under uncertainty. In the past this problem was ignored, but today petroleum engineers increasingly consider uncertainty and risk analysis. From the viewpoint of data quality there are three criteria for making decisions [1]: ? Under fully deterministic conditions, when all data are known and complete; ? Under risky conditions, when random data can be described in terms of probability theory; the main criterion is the expectation value of the parameter that determines the quality of the decision; ? Under conditions of uncertainty, when it is difficult or impossible to classify data by their degree of significance and when it is impossible to apply probability theory methods, as distribution functions or other statistical parameters of these values are unknown. This specification of terms is relevant as confusion of terms often causes ambiguity. Sometimes uncertainty analysis is conducted by the Monte-Carlo method applying series of random values of some parameters in compliance with given functions of probability distribution. It is obvious that the problem is reduced to risky conditions. In reality, as a rule, distribution functions are unknown, so we have the third type of conditions (under uncertainty) and the Monte Carlo method is not applicable.In this case the decision-making problems are usually defined in terms of game theory, representing them as a “game with Nature”. [1,2]. This paper considers different game criteria, which can be rather useful tools to increase the efficiency of decisions when managing oil and gas production processes under conditions of uncertainty. To make it more illustrative, a specific example of hydraulic fracturing design is used in the subsequent text.
机译:如今,不同的计算方法和软件包设计井的良好活动是在石油工程师的处置。这并不意味着石油和天然气行业的决策已经变成了常规。最常见的问题石油工程师面临的是这些计算中使用的储层参数是未知的或不可靠的。因此,通常的石油工程师必须在不确定性下做出决定。在过去这个问题被忽略了,但今天石油工程师越来越多地考虑不确定性和风险分析。从数据质量的角度来看,制定决定有三个标准[1]:?在完全确定性条件下,所有数据都是已知和完成的;还是在危险条件下,当随机数据可以在概率理论方面描述;主要标准是决定决定质量的参数的期望值;还是在不确定性的条件下,当困难或不可能通过其显着程度来分类数据时,并且当不可能施加概率理论方法时,作为这些值的分布函数或其他统计参数是未知的。本条款规范与术语的混乱常常导致歧义是相关的。有时,不确定性分析由Monte-Carlo方法进行应用程序系列随机值,其一些参数的随机值符合概率分布的给定功能。很明显,问题减少到风险状况。实际上,通常,分发功能是未知的,所以我们有第三种类型的条件(在不确定性下),蒙特卡罗方法不适用。在这种情况下,决策问题通常在游戏理论方面定义,代表他们作为“与自然游戏”。 [1,2]。本文考虑了不同的游戏标准,这可能是在不确定性条件下管理石油和天然气生产过程时提高决策效率的不同游戏标准。为了使其更具说明性,在随后的文本中使用液压压裂设计的具体示例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号