首页> 外文会议>Maximising value through effective asset management >Game Theory Application for Hydraulic Fracture Design
【24h】

Game Theory Application for Hydraulic Fracture Design

机译:博弈论在水力压裂设计中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Today different methods of calculation and software packages to design well activities properly are at the disposal of petroleum engineers. This does not mean that decisionmaking in the oil and gas industry has turned into a routine. The most common problem petroleum engineers face is that reservoir parameters used in these calculations are unknown or unreliable. Thus, very often petroleum engineers have to make decisions under uncertainty. In the past this problem was ignored, but today petroleum engineers increasingly consider uncertainty and risk analysis. From the viewpoint of data quality there are three criteria for making decisions [1]: ? Under fully deterministic conditions, when all data are known and complete; ? Under risky conditions, when random data can be described in terms of probability theory; the main criterion is the expectation value of the parameter that determines the quality of the decision; ? Under conditions of uncertainty, when it is difficult or impossible to classify data by their degree of significance and when it is impossible to apply probability theory methods, as distribution functions or other statistical parameters of these values are unknown. This specification of terms is relevant as confusion of terms often causes ambiguity. Sometimes uncertainty analysis is conducted by the Monte-Carlo method applying series of random values of some parameters in compliance with given functions of probability distribution. It is obvious that the problem is reduced to risky conditions. In reality, as a rule, distribution functions are unknown, so we have the third type of conditions (under uncertainty) and the Monte Carlo method is not applicable.In this case the decision-making problems are usually defined in terms of game theory, representing them as a “game with Nature”. [1,2]. This paper considers different game criteria, which can be rather useful tools to increase the efficiency of decisions when managing oil and gas production processes under conditions of uncertainty. To make it more illustrative, a specific example of hydraulic fracturing design is used in the subsequent text.
机译:如今,石油工程师可以使用各种计算方法和软件包来正确设计井眼作业。这并不意味着石油和天然气行业的决策已成为常规。石油工程师面临的最常见问题是,这些计算中使用的储层参数未知或不可靠。因此,很多时候石油工程师不得不在不确定的情况下做出决定。在过去,这个问题被忽略了,但是如今,石油工程师越来越多地考虑不确定性和风险分析。从数据质量的角度来看,有三个决策标准[1]:在完全确定的条件下,所有数据均已知且完整时; ?在有风险的情况下,可以根据概率论描述随机数据;主要标准是确定决策质量的参数的期望值; ?在不确定性的条件下,当很难或不可能通过数据的重要程度对数据进行分类时,以及当不可能应用概率论方法时,这些值的分布函数或其他统计参数都是未知的。术语的说明是有意义的,因为术语的混淆经常会引起歧义。有时,不确定性分析是通过蒙特卡洛方法,根据给定的概率分布函数,应用一系列参数的一系列随机值进行的。显然,问题已减少到危险的情况。实际上,通常情况下,分布函数是未知的,因此我们具有第三种条件(在不确定性下),并且蒙特卡罗方法不适用。在这种情况下,决策问题通常根据博弈论来定义,代表他们是“与自然的游戏”。 [1,2]。本文考虑了不同的博弈标准,当不确定性条件下管理油气生产过程时,这可能是提高决策效率的相当有用的工具。为了使其更具说明性,在随后的文字中使用了水力压裂设计的特定示例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号