首页> 外文会议>Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting >Geothermometric Temperature Comparison of Hot Springs and Wells in Southern Idaho
【24h】

Geothermometric Temperature Comparison of Hot Springs and Wells in Southern Idaho

机译:南爱达荷州温泉和井的地质温度比较

获取原文

摘要

Conventional geothermal resource prospecting often begins with geochemical analysis of geothermal fluids sampled from surface expressions (hot springs and fumaroles). Similarly, water samples from hot wells located near the surface expressions are also routinely collected and analyzed as a part of regional exploration efforts. The chemical compositions of these water samples can be used to assess the likely reservoir temperatures of the geothermal sites as well as to understand other reservoir characteristics. In this paper, we present comparative results of geothermometric reservoir temperatures based on water compositions measured from pairs of hot springs and nearby wells of 10 potential geothermal sites in southern Idaho using both traditional and multicomponent equilibrium geothermometric approaches. Our results show that the reservoir temperatures estimated using water compositions measured surface thermal features and wells produce similar results. However, for two of the 10 sites, Durfee Hot Spring and Fairchild Hot Spring, the estimated reservoir temperatures based on water compositions measured from hot springs were significantly higher than the estimated reservoir temperatures using the well water sample. In the case of the Durfee system, the well water may have chemically re-equilibrated within the aquifer resulting in a lower estimated temperature than that calculated using the hot spring. Similarly, in the case of the Fairchild system, the hot spring and well water chemistry are chemically distinct and had the greatest distance between the hot spring and well pairs of the examined geothermal sites. The difference in fluid chemistry suggests that the Fairchild Hot Spring reservoir is compartmentalized and the two expressions are issuing waters migrated from two separate portions of the reservoir. Although the majority of the hot spring/well pairs in southern Idaho provided concordant reservoir temperatures, it is imperative to consider the consistency of the water types and distance between the sources when estimating reservoir temperatures.
机译:常规地热资源勘探通常始于从表面表达中取样的地热流体的地球化学分析(热弹簧和富马族)开始。类似地,位于表面表达附近的热井的水样也经常收集和分析为区域勘探工作的一部分。这些水样的化学成分可用于评估地热部位的可能储层温度以及了解其他储层特征。在本文中,我们使用传统和多组分​​平衡地热测定方法在南部爱达荷州10位潜在地热部位对10次潜在地热位点测量的水组合物基于水组合物的比较结果。我们的研究结果表明,使用水组合物估计的储层温度测得的表面热特征和井产生类似的结果。然而,对于10个位点中的两个,Durfee温泉和飞晶温泉,基于来自热弹簧测量的水组合物的估计的储层温度明显高于使用井水样品的估计储层温度。在Durfee系统的情况下,井水可以在含水层内进行化学重新平衡,导致估计温度较低,而不是使用温泉计算。类似地,在飞兆半导体系统的情况下,温泉和井水化学在化学上拼凑而成,并且在温泉和良好的检查地热部位之间具有最大的距离。流体化学的差异表明,占地面积的飞芯水泉储存器,两种表达式发出从储层的两个单独部分迁移的水域。虽然南部爱达荷州的大多数温泉/井对提供了一致的储层温度,但在估计储层温度时,需要考虑水类型和源之间的距离的一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号