首页> 外文会议>European Wind Energy Conference Exhibition >Validation of 'Virtual' Wind Datasets from Mesoscale modelling
【24h】

Validation of 'Virtual' Wind Datasets from Mesoscale modelling

机译:验证Mescre Modeling的“虚拟”风数据集

获取原文

摘要

The application of limited area numerical weather prediction (NWP) models for wind assessment is not new to the wind industry. One of the most common applications is the so called "Virtual" wind data. MEGAJOULE has been using mesoscale models since 2007. An initial validation effort based on the "virtual" wind data approach was already published in 2011[1]. This paper presents a second validation effort, which includes developments made in the meantime. Validations are based on 3×3 km resolution estimates from mesoscale model WRF of 10 minute horizontal wind speed and direction time series. Input weather data used is the NCEP - FNL data set. Simulations are compared with local measurements from 13 sites located in Portugal. Observations are taken in typical wind assessment masts compliant with IEC and MEASNET recommendations. These observations are not used or assimilated in simulations, neither as inputs nor with MOS on any post-calibration of results. In what concerns mean wind speed, results show a good agreement with observations. Root Mean Square error is of 0.47 m/s while BIAS is of -0.04 m/s. Frequency distribution of absolute error shows that more than 50% of results are within +/-0.50 m/s deviation and that 80% of results show a deviation not above +/-0.56 m/s. These results compare well with previous validations from MJ, with evidence of improvements. Still, some limitations related with the geographical spread and the number of sample should be considered.
机译:有限区域数值天气预报(NWP)模型的风化模型对风力行业来说并不新鲜。其中一个最常见的应用程序是所谓的“虚拟”风数据。自2007年以来,Megajoule一直在使用Mesoscale模型。2011 [1]已经发布了基于“虚拟”风数据方法的初始验证工作。本文提出了第二次验证工作,包括与此同时提出的发展。验证基于3×3km的分辨率,来自Mescule模型WRF的10分钟水平风速和方向时间序列。使用的输入天气数据是NCEP - FNL数据集。将模拟与位于葡萄牙的13个站点的局部测量进行了比较。在符合IEC和SEARNET建议的典型风评估桅杆中采用观察。这些观察结果在模拟中不使用或同化,既不是任何结果的输入也不是输入,也不是结果的任何校准。涉及风速的顾虑,结果表现出与观察的良好一致。根均方误差为0.47米/秒,偏置为-0.04米/秒。绝对误差的频率分布表明,超过50%的结果在+/- 0.50米/秒内,80%的结果显示偏差不高于+/- 0.56 m / s。这些结果与以前的MJ验证相比,具有改进的证据。尽管如此,应考虑与地理扩展相关的一些限制和样本数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号