首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition >Exploring the architecture of structure: Integrating structures into design studio using object-oriented CAD
【24h】

Exploring the architecture of structure: Integrating structures into design studio using object-oriented CAD

机译:探索结构的体系结构:使用面向对象的CAD将结构集成到Design Studio中

获取原文

摘要

While the design studio environment has had a central role in teaching fundamental design skills in architectural education, it also provides an opportunity for synthesis of related coursework in developing architectural design solutions. However, the design studio's traditional emphasis on conceptual design and nurturing artistic expression can result in the exploration of related technical issues such as structures and construction being relegated to a more cursory role. Architecture schools have been criticized for failing to provide sufficient technical education and preparation for the realities of practice [1]. Deficiencies in knowledge-development related to construction and building technologies has often been a specific point of criticism. This is based in part on the perception that the emphasis in design studio on aesthetics, history, and theory results in the students graduating with limited knowledge base in building technology and construction. In response, some argue that the mandate of architectural education is to cultivate skills in life-long learning and that practice is where students develop technical knowledge [2]. This debate on the extent to which architectural education should focus on technical skills has now been expanded to include the role of CAD in architectural design [3]. The drafting table has been supplanted by the computer in architectural practice [4], yet it remains a fixture in academic environments. The argument that as a design tool CAD is unsuitable or poorly matched to the task has been widespread [5, 6]. Some have argued that CAD has induced "the evacuation of creativity" in the architectural design process [5]. In contrast, others respond that computers have the potential to radically alter the process of architectural design and that digital-based design will replace traditional modes of architectural design [6]. The failure to find an appropriate role for the computer in design both in education and practice may lead to missed opportunities to exploit digital design tools for new ways of conceiving architecture. For example, the power of computer visualization has made possible new uses for perspective views as a design tool. Laseau [7] proposed that the efficiencies with which computers can generate perspectives can assist designers to focus on the experience of space. However there is also the opportunity to utilize the strengths and efficiencies of digital design to enhance learning in the technical aspects of design in which studio education is perceived lacking.
机译:虽然设计工作室环境在建筑教育中教授基本设计技巧方面具有核心作用,但它还为开发建筑设计解决方案的相关课程综合提供了机会。然而,设计工作室对概念设计和培养艺术表达的传统重点可能导致探索相关技术问题,如结构和施工被降级为更具粗略角色。建筑学校因未能提供足够的技术教育并为实践现实做准备[1]而受到批评。与建筑和建筑技术相关的知识发展缺陷往往是一个特定的批评点。这部分是基于意见,即在美学,历史和理论上强调设计工作室,在建筑技术和建筑中毕业的学生毕业。作为回应,有人认为建筑教育的任务是培养终身学习的技能,并且该练习是学生发展技术知识的地方[2]。这辩论现在已经扩大了建筑教育应关注技术技能的程度,以包括CAD在建筑设计中的作用[3]。牵引表已被计算机在建筑实践中取代[4],但它仍然是学术环境中的夹具。作为设计工具CAD的论点是不合适的或与任务匹配的匹配普遍存在[5,6]。有些人认为CAD在建筑设计过程中诱发了“疏散创造力”[5]。相比之下,其他人应对计算机有可能从根本上改变建筑设计的过程,并且基于数字的设计将取代传统的建筑设计模式[6]。未能在教育和实践中找到适当的计算机角色,可能导致错过利用数字设计工具的机会以获得新的建筑架构的新方法。例如,计算机可视化的功率使得可以成为设计工具的透视图的新用途。 LASEAL [7]建议计算机可以生成观点的效率可以帮助设计师专注于空间的经验。然而,还有机会利用数字设计的优势和效率,增强学习的设计的技术方面,在该设计中被认为缺乏工作室教育。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号