首页> 外文会议>Beltwide Cotton Conference >HERBIVORE FEEDING AND INDUCTION OF SYSTEMIC RESISTANCE IN COTTON PLANTS
【24h】

HERBIVORE FEEDING AND INDUCTION OF SYSTEMIC RESISTANCE IN COTTON PLANTS

机译:棉花植物中的草食物喂养和诱导全身性抗性

获取原文

摘要

Cotton plants defend themselves against feeding injury from the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua, by direct and indirect (incurred through natural enemies of the herbivore) resistance, both of which can be systemic and inducible. Numerous studies havedemonstrated that plant signals are transmitted upward in the cotton plant, but no attempts have been made to examine the potential that the systemic response is transported downward in cotton, although such movement has been demonstrated in the lima bean. Therefore, we examined the direction of systemically induced resistance in cotton using the beet armyworm as eliciting herbivore. In addition, we evaluated the roles that herbivore density and duration of herbivory play in the process of induction and the systemic response in cotton plants. Plants should be favored to respond differentially to variations in the magnitude and duration of defoliation because resistance induction is assumed to be costly. Results confirmed upward transmission of inducedsystemic resistance (ISR) in cotton, as bioassay S. exigua caterpillars reared on both young, expanding leaves and mature leaves following previous S. exigua herbivory on lower leaves performed worse than those on control plants. ISR was not observed inleaves lower than actual damaged leaves, however, as bioassay S. exigua caterpillars raised on leaves immediately below the damaged leaves performed equally well in comparison with their counterparts from control plants. The duration of feeding did notaffect the magnitude of ISR, provided that the feeding damage was kept at the same level. The feeding damage following 1 d herbivory was not statistically significant than that following 3 d herbivory. Therefore, the levels of ISR of 1 and 3 d herbivorydid not differ. The relationship between amount of feeding damage inflicted within the same period of time and magnitude of ISR in young, expanding leaves was best expressed as quadratic. The magnitude of ISR increased as feeding damage mounted before reaching a peak value, then it leveled off or even decreased as feeding damage kept increasing.
机译:棉花植物侵害甜菜羊虫饲养伤害,飞翅虫,通过直接和间接(通过食草动物的天敌发生)抵抗力,两者都可以是系统性和诱导的。许多研究具有植物信号在棉花厂上向上传播,但没有尝试检查系统响应在棉花下向下运输的可能性,尽管在利马豆中已经证明了这种运动。因此,我们检查了使用甜菜羊虫为引发食草动物的棉花系统诱导的抗性的方向。此外,我们还评估了草食物密度和草食病持续时间在诱导过程中的作用以及棉花植物的全身反应。应该有利于植物差异地反应落叶幅度和持续时间的变化,因为抗性诱导被认为是昂贵的。结果证实了棉花诱导系统抗性(ISR)的向上传播,因为在以前的叶片上饲养的生物测定S. exigua毛毛虫,在以前的叶片下降叶片下的叶片和成熟的叶片上的下叶片下降而不是对照植物中的那些。然而,ISR未观察到实际受损的叶片低于实际受损的叶片,因为与来自对照植物的对应物相比,在受损叶片的叶片上饲养的生物测定S. exigua毛毛虫。进料的持续时间确实未能造成ISR的幅度,条件是饲料损坏保持在同一水平。在1 d后草的喂养损伤并没有统计学意义,而不是3 d草本患者。因此,ISR的水平为1和3 D草莓DID没有差异。在幼小的同一时间和ISR的相同时间和ISR的相同时间内造成的饲养损伤量之间的关系最好表达为二次。由于在达到峰值之前安装的喂养损坏,ISR的幅度增加,然后在喂养损坏保持增加时,它缩小甚至降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号