首页> 外文会议>ACI annual convertion >On the Accuracy of Fracture Toughness Test Results for Concrete Using Different Size and Geometry Specimens and Data Reduction Methods
【24h】

On the Accuracy of Fracture Toughness Test Results for Concrete Using Different Size and Geometry Specimens and Data Reduction Methods

机译:用不同尺寸和几何样本和数据减少方法对混凝土裂缝韧性试验结果的准确性

获取原文

摘要

Much research has been performed on measuring the fracture toughness of concrete, but inconsistent toughness values in the literature leave some questions yet unanswered. This paper provides results of a broad-based experimental program designed to determine if certain tests produce an accurate measure of fracture toughness for concrete. The results of this study can be used to help make rational decisions when selecting a combination of specimen size, geometry and data reduction method to measure the fracture toughness of concrete. To be accurate, the fracture toughness value must be the same as would be obtained from an infinitely large test specimen. To show that a value of fracture toughness is accurate requires consistent values from tests using different size and geometry specimens and different data reduction methods. Therefore, this investigation uses three sizes of single edge, SE, and round double beam, RDB, specimens. More than one data reduction method was applied to the results of each size and geometry combination. Four different data reduction methods were used: linear elastic fracture mechanics, the two-parameter method, the size-effect method, and the Barker method. Results are presented from three batches of concrete, which represent two distinctively different mixes. The fracture toughness values obtained were not consistent within each batch; therefore, the most accurate value could not be shown conclusively. However, several significant conclusions were formed. The most common laboratory specimen size, no more than 310 mm deep/tall, is not sufficiently large to obtain an accurate measure of fracture toughness for concrete using either specimen geometry. Even the largest specimens, 1240 mm-tall RDB, experienced significant nonlinear fracture mechanics conditions for all of the concrete mixes. Combining the experimental results with numerical simulations could provide sufficient information to judge which of the fracture toughness values, if any, are close to the value that would be obtained from an infinitely large specimen.
机译:已经对测量混凝土的断裂韧性进行了许多研究,但文献中的韧性值不一致留下了一些问题。本文提供了一种广泛的实验程序的结果,旨在确定某些试验是否产生准确的混凝土裂缝韧性。该研究的结果可用于帮助在选择样本尺寸,几何和数据减少方法的组合时进行理性决定,以测量混凝土的断裂韧性。准确地说,断裂韧性值必须与从无限大的试样中获得的相同。为了表明,裂缝韧性的值是准确的,需要使用不同尺寸和几何样本和不同数据减少方法的测试中的一致值。因此,本研究采用三种尺寸的单边缘,SE和圆形双梁,RDB,标本。将多个数据减少方法应用于每个尺寸和几何组合的结果。使用了四种不同的数据减少方法:线性弹性断裂力学,双参数方法,尺寸效应法和Barker方法。结果由三批混凝土提出,其代表两个独特不同的混合物。所得裂缝韧性值在每批中不一致;因此,最准确的值无法得出结论。然而,形成了几种重要结论。最常见的实验室标本尺寸不超过310毫米/高,不足以获得使用试样几何形状的混凝土的准确测量骨折韧性。即使是最大的标本,1240 mm高的RDB,也为所有混凝土混合物经历了显着的非线性断裂力学条件。将实验结果与数值模拟相结合可以提供足够的信息来判断骨折韧性值(如果有的话)接近来自无限大型标本的值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号