首页> 外文会议>IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference >The optimal crystal geometry for small-field-of-view gamma cameras: arrays or disks?
【24h】

The optimal crystal geometry for small-field-of-view gamma cameras: arrays or disks?

机译:小视野伽马摄像机的最佳晶体几何形状:数组或磁盘?

获取原文

摘要

This work presents performance characteristics of crystal disks and needles such as energy spectrum, energy resolution and number of photoelectrons. Basic differences in the presented geometries are the discrete (arrays) or the continuous (disks) incrementation of the scintillation. Most of the low-energy animal cameras use crystal needles arranged in arrays to guarantee both linearity and optimal spatial resolution. Further reduction of the needle size to improve spatial resolution leads to internal reflection losses and detection efficiency. On the other hand crystal disks offer a high light output, but show nonlinear effects close to the edges. We compared different kind of geometries of CsJ(Na), CsJ(T1) and NaJ(T1) disks with CsJ(Na) and CsJ(T1) needles of different geometries and coatings. To determine the energy resolution as well as the number of photoelectrons we used a single electron PMT (RCA8850) and a 140 keV gamma source. Crystal disks always generate a greater number of photoelectrons and had a better energy resolution (< 10%) compared to optimized needle geometries, which were worse than 16%. Calculations based on the presented data help to recognize the limitations of spatial resolution for low energy camera designs. This work presents performance characteristics of crystal disks and needles such as energy spectrum, energy resolution and number of photoelectrons. Basic differences in the presented geometries are the discrete (arrays) or the continuous (disks) incrementation of the scintillation. Most of the low-energy animal cameras use crystal needles arranged in arrays to guarantee both linearity and optimal spatial resolution. Further reduction of the needle size to improve spatial resolution leads to internal reflection losses and detection efficiency. On the other hand crystal disks offer a high light output, but show nonlinear effects close to the edges. We compared different kind of geometries of CsJ(Na), CsJ(T1) and NaJ(T1) disks with CsJ(Na) and CsJ(T1) needles of different geometries and coatings. To determine the energy resolution as well as the number of photoelectrons we used a single electron PMT (RCA8850) and a 140 keV gamma source. Crystal disks always generate a greater number of photoelectrons and had a better energy resolution (< 10%) compared to optimized needle geometries, which were worse than 16%. Calculations based on the presented data help to recognize the limitations of spatial resolution for low energy camera designs.
机译:这项工作呈现了晶体盘和针的性能特征,例如能量谱,能量分辨率和光电子的数量。所提出的几何形状的基本差异是离散(阵列)或闪烁的连续(磁盘)递增。大多数低能量动物摄像机使用阵列中布置的晶体针来保证线性度和最佳空间分辨率。进一步减小针尺寸以提高空间分辨率导致内部反射损耗和检测效率。另一方面,晶体磁盘提供高光输出,但显示靠近边缘的非线性效果。我们将CSJ(NA),CSJ(T1)和NAJ(T1)盘的不同类型的几何形状与不同几何形状和涂层的CSJ(NA)和CSJ(T1)针头进行了比较。确定能量分辨率以及我们使用单个电子PMT(RCA8850)和140keV伽马源的光电子的数量。晶体磁盘总是产生更多的光电子,与优化的针头几何形状相比,具有更好的能量分辨率(<10%),这比16%更差。基于所提出的数据的计算有助于识别低能量相机设计的空间分辨率的局限性。这项工作呈现了晶体盘和针的性能特征,例如能量谱,能量分辨率和光电子的数量。所提出的几何形状的基本差异是离散(阵列)或闪烁的连续(磁盘)递增。大多数低能量动物摄像机使用阵列中布置的晶体针来保证线性度和最佳空间分辨率。进一步减小针尺寸以提高空间分辨率导致内部反射损耗和检测效率。另一方面,晶体磁盘提供高光输出,但显示靠近边缘的非线性效果。我们将CSJ(NA),CSJ(T1)和NAJ(T1)盘的不同类型的几何形状与不同几何形状和涂层的CSJ(NA)和CSJ(T1)针头进行了比较。确定能量分辨率以及我们使用单个电子PMT(RCA8850)和140keV伽马源的光电子的数量。晶体磁盘总是产生更多的光电子,与优化的针头几何形状相比,具有更好的能量分辨率(<10%),这比16%更差。基于所提出的数据的计算有助于识别低能量相机设计的空间分辨率的局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号