首页> 外文会议>Environmental permitting symposium >Avoiding the Pitfalls of Watershed-based Water Quality Permitting for Point Source Discharges
【24h】

Avoiding the Pitfalls of Watershed-based Water Quality Permitting for Point Source Discharges

机译:避免流域水质的陷阱允许点源放电

获取原文

摘要

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has encouraged states to use the "watershed approach" to water quality permitting. Using this approach, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits are issued on a watershed-by-watershed basis, rather than one permit at a time. Currently, few states conduct water quality permitting on a watershed basis. Instead, evaluations for renewal and issuance of individual permits are conducted independently. This paper will present a case study for a discharger in Ohio, a state that uses watershed permitting, discussing some of the pitfalls to avoid when establishing watershed-based permits. There are a number of organizational and regulatory benefits to the watershed permitting approach. A watershed approach can facilitate development of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs), which are required by the Clean Water Act. Also, the watershed approach can ease implementation of pollution controls across the watershed and facilitate public comment on permits. However, there are a number of technical pitfalls associated with applying traditional point source permitting approaches to a watershed. Traditional approaches use a single set of "critical" environmental and discharge conditions to calculate effluent limitations. The "safety factors" inherent in the calculations multiply when more than one discharge is evaluated. The resulting effluent limitations are usually much more stringent than needed to protect water quality, placing an unnecessary (and often expensive) burden on the dischargers. This paper describes the problems encountered by a discharger in eastern Ohio when traditional methods were used for watershed-based permitting. A probabilistic modeling evaluation demonstrated that the "critical" steady-state limits derived by the state regulatory agency were more stringent than necessary to protect water quality. Alternative permit limitations were developed that were fully protective of water quality, but were less stringent and more practical to achieve.
机译:美国环境保护局(EPA)鼓励各国使用“流域方法”来水质允许。使用这种方法,国家污染物排放消除系统(NPDES)许可证在流域的基础上发布,而不是一次许可证。目前,很少有国家在流域进行水质。相反,续签和发行个人许可证的评估是独立进行的。本文将在俄亥俄州的卸货案例中提出一个案例研究,该案例研究了一种使用流域允许的国家,讨论一些缺陷,以避免在建立基于流域的允许时。对流域允许的方法有许多组织和监管益处。流域的方法可以促进清洁水法所要求的总日最大载荷(TMDL)的开发。此外,流域的方法可以缓解流域污染控制的实施,并促进公众就许可证评论。然而,有许多技术缺陷与应用传统的点来源允许进入流域的方法相关联。传统方法使用单一的“关键”环境和放电条件来计算出污水限制。当评估多于一个放电时,计算中固有的“安全因子”乘以。由此产生的污水限制通常比保护水质所需的更严格,放置在放电者上不必要的(和通常昂贵)的负担。本文介绍了当传统方法用于流域的允许时,俄亥俄州东部遇到的问题。概率建模评估表明,国家监管机构所产生的“临界”稳态限制比保护水质的必要性更严格。开发了替代许可限制,这是完全保护水质,但达到严格和更加实用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号