首页> 外文会议>Beltwide Cotton Conferences >WEED CONTROL IN CONVENTIONAL AND CONSERVATION TILLAGE COTTON SYSTEMS IN ARIZONA
【24h】

WEED CONTROL IN CONVENTIONAL AND CONSERVATION TILLAGE COTTON SYSTEMS IN ARIZONA

机译:亚利桑那州常规和保护耕作棉系统中的杂草控制

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The tillage operations required to grow an annual barley and cotton crop rotation were reduced by eliminating tillage prior to planting cotton, eliminating cultivations for weed control in cotton, and especially by eliminating tillage following cotton. Data collected in 2002, 2003 and 2004 in Marana showed that a weed sensing automatic spotspray system reduced the amount of spray volume and herbicide used by 40 to 60%, but data from Maricopa in 2003 indicated that the savings could be much greater when there was a thick layer of barley cover crop residue or much less when volunteer grain germinated after grain harvest in the cotton crop. At Maricopa in 2004, large volunteer cotton plants in the furrows in early planted no-till cotton also reduced the spray volume savings from using the weed sensing automatic spot-spray system. Weed control was similar with the weed sensing, automatic spot-spray system compared to the conventional continuous spray system for most weed species. In Marana (2002, 2003and 2004) and Maricopa (2003 and 2004), there were yield differences between treatments related to planting date, with late-planted cotton yielding less than early-planted cotton. At Marana, the no-till and conventionally tilled cotton yields in treatments with the same planting date were not statistically different in 2002 and 2003. However, in 2004, the early-planted conventionally tilled cotton out-yielded the barley cover crop/early-planted no-till cotton treatment. At Maricopa in 2003, the barley cover crop/early-planted no-till cotton treatment yielded less than the early-planted conventionally tilled cotton treatment (956 versus 1141 lb/A). In 2004, there were no yield differences between the two early planted cotton treatments; however, the late-planted conventionally tilled cotton yielded 28% more than the late-planted no-till cotton. Although the yield comparisons are not yet definitive, it appears that in some situations no-till cotton may yield less than conventionally tilled cotton.
机译:通过在种植棉花之前消除耕作,消除棉花染色控制的培养,尤其是通过消除棉花后染色的培养,减少了生长年大麦和棉花作物旋转的耕作作业。 2002年,2003年和2004年收集的数据表明,杂草传感的自动烟雾处理系统将喷雾体积和除草剂的量减少40%至60%,但2003年的MariCopa的数据表明,当存在时,节省可能会更大一层厚厚的大麦覆盖作物残留物或更少,当棉田作物中谷物收获后发芽的志愿者谷物时少得多。在2004年的MariCopa,大型志愿者棉花植物在早期种植的沟槽中,也减少了使用杂草传感自动点喷雾系统的喷雾量节省。与大多数杂草种类的传统连续喷涂系统相比,杂草控制与杂草感应相似,自动点喷雾系统类似。在马拉纳(2002年,2003年,2004年)和Maricopa(2003年和2004年)中,与种植日有关的治疗之间产生的差异,晚期种植的棉花产量低于早期棉花。在马拉纳,2002年和2003年,在同一种植日的治疗中的治疗中的棉花产量没有统计学不同。然而,在2004年,早期种植的常规耕种棉花出产,大麦覆盖作物/早期 - 种植棉花治疗。在2003年的MariCopa,大麦罩覆盖作物/早期种植的棉花处理产量小于早期种植的常规耕种棉治疗(956对1141磅/ A)。 2004年,两种早期种植的棉花治疗之间没有产量差异;然而,常规耕种棉花的晚期产量超过晚期种植的棉花。虽然产量比较尚未确定,但在某些情况下,在某些情况下,棉花可能会产生不到常规耕种的棉花。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号