首页> 外文会议>Beltwide Cotton Conferences >Comparison of sampling techniques for tarnished plant bug and predaceous arthropods
【24h】

Comparison of sampling techniques for tarnished plant bug and predaceous arthropods

机译:玷污植物虫子和预留节肢动物采样技术的比较

获取原文

摘要

The relative efficiencies of beat sheet, sweep net and a hand-carried pneumatic keep-it-simple sampler (KISS) for sampling the tarnished plant bug and predaceous arthropods in cotton were examined in 1999. We used variance/mean ratio (#sigma#~2/x-bar) as the criteria for comparing sampling techniques. KISS and beat sheets collected similar numbers of tarnished plant bugs which were significantly greater than those collected by sweep nets. All three sampling methods had similar #sigma#~2/x-bar ratios for the tarnished plant bug. KISS collected significantly more beneficial arthropods than beat sheets which, in turn, collected significantly more beneficials than sweep nets. Variance/mean ratios of beneficial arthropods were similar for KISS and sweep nets which were significantly smaller than those for beat sheets. We found that beat sheets and KISS effectively captured the tarnished plant bug while sweep net was less effective especially at low population densities. KISS appears to be the method of choice for sampling beneficial arthropods.
机译:在1999年检查了用于取样染色植物虫和棉花染色的植物虫和棉花的预先节肢动物的相对效率。我们使用了方差/平均值(#sigma# 〜2 / x-bar)作为比较采样技术的标准。亲吻和拍纸收集了类似数量的玷污植物虫,这明显大于由扫丝网收集的植物虫。所有三种采样方法都具有相似的#sigma#〜2 / x×条比,用于玷污的植物虫子。 Kiss收集的比拍板收集的更有益的节肢动物,又收集比扫丝的更有益。有益节肢动物的差异/平均比例类似于亲吻和扫描网相似,这些蚊帐显着小于节拍板的蚊帐。我们发现,击败床单和亲吻有效地捕获了突出的植物虫,而扫过净尤其在低人口密度下效果较小。吻似乎是采样有益节肢动物的首选方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号