首页> 外文会议>NCSL Workshop and Symposium >25 Years of Interlaboratory Comparisons among Accredited Calibration Laboratories in Europe - The Experience of PTB and DKD
【24h】

25 Years of Interlaboratory Comparisons among Accredited Calibration Laboratories in Europe - The Experience of PTB and DKD

机译:欧洲经认可校准实验室的25年间互上比较 - PTB和DKD的经验

获取原文

摘要

Establishing and maintaining confidence in the correctness of measurement results of accredited calibration laboratories is an important matter for the transborder mutual acceptance of issued certificates. The organisation of interlaboratory comparisons is a powerful means for developing such confidence under two different aspects. Firstly, the measurement results of the participating laboratories, chosen as a representative sample of all accredited laboratories of the national calibration services involved, shall demonstrate their technical calibration capabilities. Secondly, the involved calibration services are challenged to demonstrate their organisational capabilities for keeping the calibration service system under control. Their response on having found improper results as well as their information to the other calibration services in the region are important actions. Apart from being used as a tool for the surveillance of accredited laboratories, interlaboratory comparisons were performed successfully on a national level to demonstrate the stability and reproducibility of newly developed measuring devices to be used as transfer standards and to intensify the technical cooperation between industrial calibration laboratories and the National Metrology Institute. For almost 25 years of its existence, the DKD (German Calibration Service) has been participating in many interlaboratory comparisons within the European co-operation of Accreditation (EA). The experience gained over the years is reported on in the following. In most cases all actions and reactions could be qualified to be adequate and promoting the mutual confidence in the laboratories and in the calibration systems. In a few cases some complaints arose which gave reason for further discussions.
机译:建立和维持对认可的校准实验室的测量结果的正确性的信心是跨境互联证书的重要事项。互借性比较组织是一种强大的方法,可以在两个不同方面发展这种信心。首先,参与实验室的测量结果选择作为所涉及的国家校准服务的所有认可实验室的代表性样本,应当展示其技术校准能力。其次,涉及的校准服务受到挑战,以展示他们在控制下保持校准服务系统的组织能力。他们对发现不正确的结果以及他们对该区域其他校准服务的信息的回应是重要的行动。除了被用作监测认可的实验室的工具外,还在国家一级成功进行了互借的比较,以证明新开发的测量装置的稳定性和再现性被用作转移标准,并加强工业校准实验室之间的技术合作和国家计量研究所。近25年的存在,DKD(德国校准服务)一直在欧洲认证(EA)的欧洲合作中参与许多间接性比较。在以下几年中获得的经验是在以下情况下报告的。在大多数情况下,所有的行动和反应都可以有资格充分和促进实验室和校准系统中的相互信心。在一些情况下,一些投诉产生了进一步讨论的理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号