首页> 外文会议>SAE Aerospace Atlantic Conference and Exposition >A comparative study of turbulence models in axisymmetric nozzle flow
【24h】

A comparative study of turbulence models in axisymmetric nozzle flow

机译:轴对称喷嘴流动湍流模型的比较研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Two turbulence models have been studied to determine which of the models should be used in further Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) research. A zero-equation turbulence model, Baldwin-Lomax (B-L), is easy to use, requires no history of the flow, and requires little in the way of additional computations or additional computer memory space. A two-equation k-ε model, Yang-Shih (Y-S), is more difficult to implement, does require flow history, and requires many more computations and much more computer space; however, it is potentially more accurate than the B-L model. Using both Navier-Stokes (NS) and Parabolized Navier-Stokes (PNS) solvers, the two models and their codes were validated against the testbed of the Wright Laboratory (WL) Mach 12 wind tunnel nozzle. Nozzle flow solution wall data and exit data were compared with experimentally obtained nozzle data, with the surprising result that the B-L model provided the more accurate solution, making it the chosen turbulence model for further nozzle research.
机译:已经研究了两个湍流模型,以确定应该在进一步计算流体动力学(CFD)研究中使用哪种模型。零方程湍流模型,Baldwin-Lomax(B-L)易于使用,不需要流量的历史,并且需要额外的计算方式或额外的计算机存储空间。两个等式K-ε模型,杨生(Y-S),更难以实现,需要流量历史,并需要更多的计算和更多的计算机空间;但是,它可能比B-L模型更准确。使用Navier-Stokes(NS)和抛物化Navier-Stokes(PNS)求解器,两种模型及其代码验证了Wright实验室(WL)Mach 12风洞喷嘴的测试平台。将喷嘴流溶液壁数据和退出数据与实验获得的喷嘴数据进行比较,具有令人惊讶的结果,即B-L型号提供更准确的解决方案,使其成为进一步喷嘴研究的所选湍流模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号