首页> 外文会议>ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference >SEISMIC PROVING TEST OF ULTIMATE PIPING STRENGTH (SAFETY MARGIN OF SEISMIC DESIGN CODE FOR PIPING)
【24h】

SEISMIC PROVING TEST OF ULTIMATE PIPING STRENGTH (SAFETY MARGIN OF SEISMIC DESIGN CODE FOR PIPING)

机译:极限管道强度的地震证明试验(管道地震设计规范的安全裕度)

获取原文

摘要

The proving test of a large-scale piping system and elasto-plastic analyses were conducted to assure safety margins of current and newly proposed seismic design codes for piping in Japanese nuclear power plants. Two test models were used, one for the design method confirmation test and one for the ultimate strength test. The allowable acceleration safety margin (M{sub}A) was defined as the ratio of A{sub}f/A{sub}(S2), where A{sub}f is the maximum input acceleration corresponding to piping failure in a single seismic input, and A{sub}(S2) is the maximum allowable input acceleration for the S{sub}2 seismic wave according to Japanese seismic design codes for Class 1 piping components. When the current code was applied to the design method confirmation test model, associated with the 10% broadened response spectrum of the S{sub}2 seismic wave for a PWR building, M{sub}A was revealed to be 9.6 for a frequency ratio (R{sub}w) of 0.7. Without the response spectrum broadening, M{sub}A decreases to 4.9. Redefined as the ratio in terms of the displacement and cyclic peak stress of the highest stressed component, the safety margins (M{sub}D, M{sub}(FC)) tend to change to 7.7 and 3.7, respectively. The newly proposed code includes the following modifications from the current code rules: 1) only the allowable stress limits to prevent fatigue failure is ruled for the "S{sub}2" seismic wave, 2) a new diagram of the K{sub}e factor in the fatigue design analysis is implemented. The safety margin M{sub}A of the proposed code with the broadened spectrum was revealed to be still as high as 6.6 for R{sub}w =0.7. Analytical evaluation was conducted to discuss the tendency of the safety margins for seismic input conditions that differ from R{sub}w =0.7, and the degree of conservatism or margin included in design analysis methods, whose degree is related to the safety margins.
机译:进行了大规模管道系统和弹性塑料分析的证明试验,以确保日本核电站管道的当前和新提出的地震设计规范的安全边缘。使用了两个测试模型,一个用于设计方法确认测试,一个用于最终的强度测试。允许的加速度安全裕度(M {sub} a)被定义为{sub} f / a {sub}(s2)的比率,其中{sub} f是对应于单个管道故障的最大输入加速度地震输入和{sub}(S2)是S {SUB} 2地震波的最大允许输入加速,根据用于1类管道组件的日本地震设计码。当将当前代码应用于设计方法确认测试模型时,与PWR构建的S {Sub} 2地震波的10%扩大响应谱相关联,频率比显示为9.6 (R {sub} w)为0.7。如果没有响应频谱宽泛,M {sub}减少到4.9。根据最高应力分量的位移和循环峰值应力而重新定义,安全边距(M {Sub} D,M {Sub}(FC))分别趋于改变为7.7和3.7。新提出的代码包括来自当前代码规则的以下修改:1)仅针对“s {sub} 2”地震波,2)统治允许的应力限制以防止疲劳失败,2)k {sub}的新图。实施疲劳设计分析的e因素。具有扩展频谱的建议代码的安全保证金M {Sub} A仍然高达6.6,对于R {Sub} W = 0.7。进行分析评估以讨论与R {Sub} W = 0.7不同的地震输入条件的安全边距的趋势,以及设计分析方法中包含的保守主义或余量,其程度与安全利润率有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号