首页> 外文会议>ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition >DESIGN OF A STEADY-STATE, PARALLEL-PLATE THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY APPARATUS FOR NANOFLUIDS AND COMPARATIVE MEASUREMENTS WITH TRANSIENT HWTC APPARATUS
【24h】

DESIGN OF A STEADY-STATE, PARALLEL-PLATE THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY APPARATUS FOR NANOFLUIDS AND COMPARATIVE MEASUREMENTS WITH TRANSIENT HWTC APPARATUS

机译:用于纳米流体的稳态,平行板热导率和瞬态HWTC装置的比较测量设计

获取原文

摘要

A steady-state, parallel-plate thermal conductivity (PPTC) apparatus has been developed and used for comparative measurements of complex POLY-nanofluids, in order to compare results with the corresponding measurements using the transient, hotwire thermal conductivity (HWTC) apparatus. The related measurements in the literature, mostly with HWTC method, have been inconsistent and with measured thermal conductivities far beyond prediction using the well-known mixture theory. The objective was to check out if existing and well-established HWTC method might have some unknown issues while measuring TC of complex nano-mixture suspensions, like electro-magnetic phenomena, undetectable hot-wire vibrations, and others. These initial and limited measurements have shown considerable difference between the two methods, where the TC enhancements measured with PPTC apparatus were about three times smaller than with HWTC apparatus, the former data being much closer to the mixture theory prediction. However, the influence of measurement method is not conclusive since it has been observed that the complex nano-mixture suspensions were very unstable during the lengthy steady-state measurements as compared to rather quick transient HWTC method. The nanofluid suspension instability might be the main reason for very inconsistent results in the literature. It is necessary to expend investigation with more stable nano-mixture suspensions.
机译:已经开发了稳态,平行板导热率(PPTC)装置,并用于复合聚纳米流体的比较测量,以便使用瞬态炎盗导热率(HWTC)装置与相应的测量结果进行比较。文献中的相关测量主要是用HWTC方法,具有不一致的,并且测量的热导体远远超出使用众所周知的混合理论的预测。目的是检查现有和良好的HWTC方法是否可能具有一些未知的问题,同时测量复合纳米混合物悬浮液的Tc,如电磁现象,不可检测的热线振动等。这些初始和有限的测量显示了两种方法之间的相当大的差异,其中用PPTC装置测量的TC增强比与HWTC装置小约三倍,前者数据更接近混合理论预测。然而,测量方法的影响不是决定性的,因为它已经观察到与相当快速的瞬态HWTC方法相比,在冗长的稳态测量期间复合纳米混合物悬浮液非常不稳定。纳米流体悬浮液不稳定性可能是文献中产生非常不一致的主要原因。有必要通过更稳定的纳米混合物悬浮液来消耗调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号