首页> 外文会议>ASME Annual Meeting >QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE ACCURACY OF CONSTITUTIVE LAWS FOR PLASTICITY WITH AN EMPHASIS ON CYCLIC DEFORMATION
【24h】

QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE ACCURACY OF CONSTITUTIVE LAWS FOR PLASTICITY WITH AN EMPHASIS ON CYCLIC DEFORMATION

机译:循环变形强调可塑性规律准确性的定量评估

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study concerns the form of constitutive models, determination of parameters, and agreement with experimental data. Studies of plasticity and cyclic loading have generated an extensive list of constitutive models that describe deformation under cyclic loading. Models vary from empirical formulations to viscoplastic models as well as time dependent and independent models. In most cases, these models are derived, evaluated in a one dimensional setting and generalized to three dimensions using a multidimensional yield criterion. Often the constitutive models are evaluated using only a limited or restricted set of experimental data. One intention of this study is to examine the application of constitutive models to constant amplitude and random amplitude loading and to compare the results with experimental stress-strain data for the same conditions. This paper addresses some basic constitutive laws used in engineering and proposes a new law which leads to a well-posed mathematical problem and agrees well with experimental data. The scope of this study is restricted to time and temperature independent models. The constitutive laws selected for this study are: kinematic hardening, isotropic hardening, and a Chaboche law that have been described in the literature. In addition to these three laws, we introduce and evaluate one new law, the B-L law. The experimental database is constructed from a series of constant amplitude and random amplitude strain controlled cyclic loading experiments with different mean levels performed on specimens of 5086 and 5454 aluminum alloy in the H32 temper. The experimental data was gathered at a constant strain rate and constant temperature. Dispersion of experimental measurements is due to experimental methods and variations in material composition, processing, and history. Measurements of stress and strain were made with care and sensitive instruments in order to reduce the dispersion associated with experimental methods to negligible levels compared to the dispersion associated with variation of the material properties from sample to sample. Replicate measurements were made to allow a more precise determination of the parameters and their dispersion due to material variability. Determination of the constitutive law parameters is based on a criterion of minimization of the deviation of the predicted stress and measured stress from several cyclic load histories. In this investigation the authors: evaluate representative constitutive models in one dimensional states of stress, identify the constitutive model parameters from an experimental database, determine the dependence of the parameters upon the material, strain history, and mean strain level by analysis of variance procedures and determine by statistic means the significance of various factors on material behavior. The agreement of stresses computed from the selected constitutive laws with the experimental data is evaluated by a relative error measure. Constitutive law parameters for error determination are taken as the average over the entire database of optimal parameters determined for each sample. The results in terms of the relative error measure indicate that: the range of variability of material response is 10% with a mean of 5%, the range for the kinematic and isotropic laws is up to 40% with a mean of 35%, and lastly the range for the Chaboche and B-L constitutive law is up 25% with a mean of 15%. The variability of material response is measured by the difference between the stresses in two samples when identical strain histories are imposed on each sample. The range and mean are defined as the statistical characterization of the stress difference over a set of various imposed strain histories. The range and associated mean for a particular constitutive law are the statistical characterization of the difference between the predicted and measured stresses for a set of strain histories Larger discrepancies are observed when parameters o
机译:这项研究涉及本构模型的形式,参数的确定,并与实验数据一致。有可塑性和循环加载的研究产生了广泛的是循环荷载作用下的变形描述本构模型的列表。从模型到粘塑性模型经验的制剂以及时间依赖性和非依赖性的模型而有所不同。在大多数情况下,这些模型导出,在一个维设定评价和使用多维屈服准则推广到三维。通常,构模型仅使用有限或受限组实验数据的评价。这项研究的一个目的是要检查构模型,以恒定的幅度和随机振幅载荷的应用,并与在相同条件的实验的应力 - 应变数据的比较结果。本文地址在工程中使用的一些基本的本构关系,提出了一种新的法律,导致一个适定的数学问题,并与实验数据吻合。这项研究的范围限于时间和温度的自主车型。本研究选取的本构关系是:运动硬化,各向同性硬化,并已在文献中描述的Chaboche法律。除了这三部法律中,我们介绍和评价一个新的法律,B-L法。实验数据库由一系列恒定幅度和受控的循环载荷试验与所述H32回火上5086和5454铝合金试样进行不同的平均水平随机振幅应变的构造。实验数据以恒定应变速率和恒定的温度收集。实验测量的分散是由于在材料组合物,加工,和历史实验方法和变型。应力和应变的测量,以减少与实验方法相比于从样本到样本的材料性质的变化相关联的色散可以忽略的程度相关联的分散体与护理和灵敏的仪器制备。重复进行了测量,以允许参数及其分散体的更精确的确定,由于材料的可变性。本构关系参数的确定是基于所预测的应力的偏差的最小化和测量的应力的从几个循环负荷的历史的一个标准。在本次调查作者:评估应力一个维州代表本构模型,从实验数据库确定本构模型参数,通过方差方法分析确定对材料,应变历史和平均应变水平的参数的依赖,通过统计方法确定对材料特性的各种因素的重要性。从与实验数据所选择的构定律计算应力的协议是由相对误差量度评估。为错误判定本构关系参数作为平均过的每个样品确定的最佳参数整个数据库。在相对误差度量方面,结果表明:材料响应的可变性的范围是为5%,平均10%,为运动学和各向同性的法律范围是高达40%,平均为35%,和最后的Chaboche和BL本构关系范围达到25%与15%的平均值。材料响应的可变性是由两个样品中的应力之间的差测量时相同的应变历史被在每个样本上施加。的范围内和平均被定义为在一组不同的施加应变历史的应力差的统计特性。的范围内,对于特定的本构关系相关平均值较大差异观察到的一组应变履历的预测和测量应力之间的差的统计特性时参数o

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号