首页> 外文会议>IMAC, A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics >Developing a Correlation Criterion (SpaceMAC) for Repeated and Pseudo-repeated Modes
【24h】

Developing a Correlation Criterion (SpaceMAC) for Repeated and Pseudo-repeated Modes

机译:开发重复和伪重复模式的相关标准(SPACEMAC)

获取原文

摘要

One of the most important factors in the validation of a finite element model is whether the modal vectors obtained from the finite element solution match sufficiently with the modal analysis results of the part or a test prototype. Modal Assurance Criteria (MAC) (Allemang, Brown, A correlation coefficient for modal vector analysis. In: Proceedings of the international modal analysis conference, pp 110-116, 1982) is usually a very effective way to check this condition. However, in case of repeated modal frequencies and vectors, MAC can give misleading results. Hence, there is a need for a method that could indicate how well the finite element method-based estimates for the repeated modes correlate with the modal analysis modes. This work is an attempt to develop a correlation criterion between a set of repeated roots from a finite element method solution and an experimental modal analysis solution. Building on a low dimensional modal vector example, a vector subspace-based approach was identified to help properly define the solution to a characteristic equation with repeated roots. This analogy was extended to higher dimension modal vector cases and vector subspace or hyper planes were identified as a way to model a repeated mode case. Similar to MAC consistency of the solution was considered as ideal way to establish correlation. But in this case the consistency of the solution subspace was found to be more important than that of normalized modal vectors. The smallest principal angle between the two solution subspaces was identified as a way of measuring the consistency. The criterion, referred to as spaceMAC, was developed as a function of this angle such that the range of the criterion is 0-1, similar to MAC was defined as 1-sin(θ) where θ is the principal angle between the two solution subspaces. This criterion was tested with two datasets 2001 Circular Plate Dataset and 2014 Circular Plate Dataset.
机译:有限元模型验证中最重要的因素之一是从有限元解决方案获得的模态矢量是否与部分或测试原型的模态分析结果充分匹配。模态保障标准(MAC)(棕褐色,棕色,模态载体分析的相关系数。在:国际模态分析会议的程序,PP 110-116,1982)通常是检查这种情况的非常有效的方法。然而,在重复的模态频率和向量的情况下,MAC可以给出误导性结果。因此,需要一种方法,该方法可以指示重复模式的基于有限元方法的估计与模态分析模式相关。这项工作是一种尝试从有限元方法解决方案和实验模态分析溶液中产生一组重复根部之间的相关标准。在低维模式矢量示例中构建,识别了一种基于矢量子空间的方法,以帮助正确地将解决方案定义为具有重复根的特征方程。该类比扩展到更高的尺寸模态矢量案例,并将向量子空间或超平面识别为模拟重复模式案例的方法。类似于解决方案的MAC一致性被认为是建立相关性的理想方式。但在这种情况下,发现解决方案子空间的一致性比标准化模态矢量更重要。两个解决方案子空间之间的最小主角被识别为测量一致性的方式。作为该角度的函数开发的标准,称为spacemac,使得标准的范围为0-1,类似于MAC被定义为1-SIN(θ),其中θ是两个解决方案之间的主要角度子空间。使用两个数据集2001圆形板数据集和2014个圆形板数据集进行测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号