首页> 外文会议>Global Stone Congress >supaipe@upvnet.upv.es, bbhernand@dig.upv.es, cbego.agudo.vicente@gmail.com
【24h】

supaipe@upvnet.upv.es, bbhernand@dig.upv.es, cbego.agudo.vicente@gmail.com

机译:苏牌PE@u PV net.up V.饿死, 北部赫尔南德@帝国.up V.饿死, CB ego.A股的哦.Vicente@Gmail.com

获取原文

摘要

This paper presents the evaluation of the efficacy of the removal of biological crust from ornamental granites. The removal was made applying different procedures and the efficiency was evaluated by means of optic and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier Transformed Infrared spectrometry (FTIR) and colour measures (CIE-L~*a~*b~* colour spaces). Among the cleaning procedures, an abrasive cleaning method, several chemicals-based methods applied by brush in aqueous media (using acids, bleach, benzalkonium chloride, ethanol and others) and laser (Nd:YVO_4 at 355 nm) were used. This last method was previously found very efficient in removing graffiti and biological crusts in other granites. The present study was conducted on a granite of great commercial value from Galicia (NW Spain) and traditionally used on construction of historical buildings in this region and abroad. Slabs of this granite with an intense biological crust were used. Before the cleaning procedures, the biological crust was characterized by the same techniques to establish the comparison between Pre and Post cleaning. The efficacy in the crust removal was evaluated with optic and electronic microscopy; the best cleaning methods were the acid-based methods and laser. In both cases, no biological remains were found on the cleaning surfaces. Hydrogommage (the abrasive cleaning method) obtained intermediate results, and benzalkonium chloride cleaning showed the worst effectiveness. FTIR technique helped to identify the presence of organic signals of biological crust; and also, it provided useful information on the contaminant remains on the stone after cleaning and on mineral damages. Colour differences after cleaning gave additional information about the efficiency of the cleaning.
机译:本文介绍了从观赏花岗岩中去除生物地壳的功效的评价。采用不同程序进行施加,通过光学和扫描电子显微镜(SEM),傅里叶变换的红外光谱(FTIR)和颜色测量(CIE-L〜* A〜* B〜*颜色空间)评估效率。在清洁程序中,使用磨料清洁方法,用刷子在水性介质中施加的几种基于化学品的方法(使用酸,漂白剂,苯氮氧化铝,乙醇和其他)和激光(Nd:YVO_4在355nm处)。此前,此前的方法在删除了其他花岗岩中的涂鸦和生物外壳方面非常有效。本研究是在Galicia(NW西班牙)的巨大商业价值的花岗岩上,传统上用于该地区和国外的历史建筑的建设。使用具有强烈的生物地壳的这种花岗岩的板。在清洁程序之前,生物地壳的特征在于通过相同的技术来建立预先清洁和清洁后的比较。用光学和电子显微镜评估地壳去除的功效;最好的清洁方法是基于酸的方法和激光。在这两种情况下,在清洁表面上没有发现生物遗体。水力换热(磨料清洁方法)获得中间结果,苯扎氯氯清洁表现出最严重的效果。 FTIR技术有助于识别生物外壳有机信号的存在;而且,它在清洁和矿物质损伤后提供了有关污染物的有用信息。清洁后的颜色差异得到了有关清洁效率的额外信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号