首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(1453) THE ROLE OF EMPLOYABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION
【24h】

(1453) THE ROLE OF EMPLOYABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION

机译:(1453)就业能力在高等教育中的作用

获取原文

摘要

Over the past twenty years or so the term 'employability' has entered the discourse of the Higher Education (HE) community and its use appears to be increasingly widespread. In fact, it is seen by some as an integral part or indeed a core element of HE in the UK and Europe. While both the adoption of the term and the implementation of employability are noticeable across the various strata of university hierarchies, there can be little doubt that much of the impetus for this proliferation derives from the senior leadership of universities and extends to national and supranational government. This paper will examine how the meaning of the term has evolved as well as some of the current definitions of the concept of employability. Then, it will explore a number of ways in which employability has been implemented. However, prior to the wide-spread appearance of 'employability' very different kinds of characteristics or properties had been considered the sine qua non of HE. Therefore, some thought will then be given to those attributes that had previously been seen as the 'core business' of universities and how they were embedded. The latter include such things as scholarliness, the fostering of critical and higherorder thinking skills and learning skills or metacognition. Interestingly, some proponents of employability, presumably aware of this tradition, have grafted these earlier ideas about the purpose of HE onto their definitions of employability. We will then look at the implications of adopting the respective visions of the role of HE. A comparison of the former and latter will reveal a tension between the two, due to the fundamentally different approaches to thinking and understanding that underpin the two views. It will be argued that the former concerns itself essentially with conformity and adherence to rules. The latter, on the other hand, prizes an evidence-based approach to decision-making and criticality over any pre-determined rule system. In fact, to a large extent the concept of employability requires the individual to relinquish any aspiration to be reflective and self-aware. If this is the case, the first question to ask must be: are these the best skills with which to equip young people but more importantly why governments and the leaders of our universities have embraced the concept so wholeheartedly. One potential explanation may be the advent of mass HE (with participation rates of 40% plus), which has brought about a change in the target audience of universities. When universities were the sole preserve of the elite, their purpose was to facilitate the imperceptible transfer of power and privilege from the current elite to their offspring. The status quo was maintained by the transmission or passing on of cultural capital inter alia from generation to generation (Bourdieu, 1971). Had they continued in the same vein, today they could not have maintained it because when power and privilege are conferred on approximately half the population, by definition the elite ceases to be an elite. Therefore, we may conclude that employability has become the new mechanism for safeguarding the social status quo.
机译:在过去的二十年中左右,“就业性”一词已进入高等教育(HE)社区的话语,其使用似乎越来越普遍。事实上,它被一些人作为一个整体部分或实际上是他在英国和欧洲的核心元素。虽然术语的采用和实施就业能力在大学等级的各种层次上都有明显,但毫无疑问,这种扩散的大部分推动力来自大学的高级领导,并扩大到国家和超国家政府。本文将研究该术语的含义如何发展以及任何现有能力概念的一些定义。然后,它将探索已经实现了许多就业性的方式。然而,在“就业性”的广泛外观之前,“就业性”非常不同的特征或性质被认为是他的正弦值。因此,有些思想将被赋予以前被视为大学的“核心业务”以及它们的嵌入方式。后者包括学术,培养批判性和高效思维技能和学习技能或元认知的东西。有趣的是,一些就业能力的支持者,可能意识到这一传统,嫁接了这些早期的想法,了解他的就业性定义。然后我们将看看采用他对他的作用的各自愿景的影响。前者和后者的比较将揭示两者之间的紧张局势,因为思考和理解的根本不同的方法,这是在两个意见下的思考和理解。据称,前者基本上符合符合性和依从规则。另一方面,后者在任何预先确定的规则系统上授予基于证据的决策和临界方法。事实上,在很大程度上,就业性的概念要求个人放弃任何渴望是反思和自我意识的。如果是这种情况,请问的第一个问题必须是:这些是装备年轻人的最佳技能,但更重要的是,为什么各国政府和大学的领导者彻底接受了这一概念。一个潜在的解释可能是大众的出现(参与40%加的参赛率),它已经带来了大学目标受众的变化。当大学是精英的唯一保留时,他们的目的是促进难以察觉的权力和特权从当前精英到他们的后代转移。除其他外,文化资本的传播或通过世代代代(Bourdieu,1971),现状QUO是维持的。如果他们继续在同一个静脉中,今天他们无法维持它,因为当权力和特权被赋予大约一半人口时,通过定义,精英不再是精英。因此,我们可以得出结论,就业能力已成为保护社会地位的新机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号