首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(1543.pdf) RACIAL DIFFERENCES IN NET ACTIVISM? QUANTIATIVE ANALYSIS OF BLACK POLITICAL ACTION ONLINE
【24h】

(1543.pdf) RACIAL DIFFERENCES IN NET ACTIVISM? QUANTIATIVE ANALYSIS OF BLACK POLITICAL ACTION ONLINE

机译:(1543.pdf)净激活主义的种族差异?在线定量分析黑政治行动

获取原文

摘要

Previous work suggests that traditional political behavior diverges as a consequence of race within theUS context. This study expands upon past findings by analyzing whether traditionally understoodcauses of such differences are influential in online political behavior as well.Individuals may point to the digital divide as determinative in the differences in internet behavior, usingthe argument that varying levels of SES lead to differences in internet access and social capital;however, Jackson (2009) finds that this is not the case. Analysis of the motivational, affective, andcognitive attitudes with respect to the internet yields a number of differences independent of factorsthat produce the digital divide, namely access to the internet. For instance, Jackson finds that blacksuse email at a greater rate than whites and are more likely to use the web to search for personallyrelevant information.This effect brings the ramifications of the apparent demographic preponderance of Whites on theinternet into question.Moreover, socioeconomic status and education have traditionally defined the differences in politicalbehavior among different racial groups within social science discourse (Verba and Nie 1972; Wolfingerand Rosenstone 1980; Verba, Scholzman, and Brady 1995). This is conceptually sound, but SESimpacts voting behavior in different ways for Blacks and Whites (Liu et al. 2009), suggesting thatdifferent social and political processes are operating for the two groups. The interplay of these socialand technological factors brings the question of political behavior online into question, prompting thepresent study. In order to accomplish this goal, I analyzed the internet module of the GSS Survey from2000. This year is convenient both because of data availability and the absence of any effects of theObama presidency. I conducted logistic regression analyses of race variables on visiting politicalwebsites, and I controlled for a number of variables that are influential in political decision making. Ifound that African Americans were most likely to visit websites to obtain political information. Thisfinding will aid in predicting political action within the net environment.
机译:以前的工作表明,传统的政治行为是由于在题目中的比赛的结果。本研究通过分析传统上的调查结果,通过分析在线政治行为中的这种差异是有影响力的影响。单独的人可能指向互联网行为的差异中的数字鸿沟,利用不同水平的SES导致差异导致差异互联网接入和社会资本;然而,杰克逊(2009)发现这不是这种情况。对互联网的励志,情感,和认知态度的分析产生了与因子分频,即访问互联网的差异。例如,杰克逊发现Blacksuse电子邮件比白人更突出,更有可能使用网络搜索人格利的信息。这一效果在Internet中提出了白人的表观人群优势的后果.Oore,社会经济地位和传统上教育传统上界定了社会科学话语中不同种族群体中的政治性群体的差异(Verba和Nie 1972; Worfingerand Rosenstone 1980; Verba,Speczman和Brady 1995)。这是概念上的声音,但以不同的方式为黑人和白人的案例表达投票行为(Liu等人,2009年),暗示这两组的各种社会和政治进程正在运作。这些社会和技术因素的相互作用在线提出了关于问题的政治行为问题,促使实验研究。为了实现这一目标,我分析了来自2000年的GSS调查的互联网模块。今年是方便的,因为数据可用性以及偷偷恐怖主义主席的任何影响。我对访问政治贩运者进行了竞争变量的Logistic回归分析,我控制了一些在政治决策中有影响力的变量。 ifound认为非洲裔美国人最有可能访问网站以获得政治信息。这种垃圾将有助于预测净环境中的政治行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号