首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(597) IDENTIKIT OF VEGAN AND VEGETARIAN’S SOCIAL REPRESENTATIONS AND SOCIAL EATING PRACTICES THROUGH FIELD STUDY, TRADITIONAL MEDIA AND WEB2.0 USERGENERATED CONTENT STUDIES IN FOUR DIFFERENT GEOCULTURAL CONTEXTS
【24h】

(597) IDENTIKIT OF VEGAN AND VEGETARIAN’S SOCIAL REPRESENTATIONS AND SOCIAL EATING PRACTICES THROUGH FIELD STUDY, TRADITIONAL MEDIA AND WEB2.0 USERGENERATED CONTENT STUDIES IN FOUR DIFFERENT GEOCULTURAL CONTEXTS

机译:(597)素食主义者和素食主义者的社会代表性和社会饮食实践通过实地考察,传统媒体和网络2.0 userguterated含量研究四种不同的地质文化背景

获取原文

摘要

The study presented in our empirical contribution benefits the interrelated world of education and health, due to the relevant applied implications of formal and informal education (in particular for the genesis and dissemination of social representations through web2.0 user-generated content among young people) as far it concerns new social eating practices, life-style and world’s views. In a world struck by climate change, economic crisis and increasing health issues, veganism and vegetarianism seem to be rapidly growing as phenomena proposing its alternative minority view on how to resolve some of these issues. The two notions can be always more frequently found in the centre of the public debates. The wide media coverage however leaves a divided public opinion, generating hegemonic, emancipated or polemical social representations depending on their degree of shared consensus. Inspired by Moscovici’s Social Representation Theory (1961/1976) [1] and his Active Minorities Theory (1976/1979) [2], the contribution investigates how groups of vegans and vegetarians see themselves as well as how are they being seen by the rest of population and comparing their views, attitudes and foods preferences in individual/social eating contexts in four different geo-cultural context/continents: Italy (Europe), Brazil (South America) and Canada (North America) in China (Asia). Three interrelated research lines inspired by de Rosa’s modelling approach [3] have been developed: a) field studies, administering de Rosa’s associative networks technique [4] [5] [6] and a specifically designed questionnaire (“Social Eating Practices”) to 484 participants, aged 19-55, belonging to 5 different self-declared groups of food-preferences (without food restrictions; meat- lovers; fish-lovers; vegetarians; vegans); b) traditional mass media, analysing on-line editions of the most read newspapers in three countries (Corriere della Sera -Italy, Correio Brazilense -Brazil, Toronto Star- Canada); c) Web2.0 social media analysis, investigating the topic related user-generated contents on Instagram and Twitter. The results indicate major similarities among vegan and vegetarian subjects in all countries, regarding the way they search for information and how they see themselves, but their views on life-style, food and social implications of their preference can be slightly different depending on cultural and economical reality of the country they live in. The level of tolerance of meat eater towards them can variate depending on country, as well as the mass-traditional or social media depiction characterized by top-down or bottom-up information structure: the former representing normative view related to the majority of food preference styles in the respective geo-cultural contexts, the latter as a channel for expressing ‘voices’ also of minority groups like vegans.
机译:由于正规和非正规教育的相关威胁(特别是通过Web2.0用户生成的社会陈述的创世纪和传播社会陈述,通过Web2.0在年轻人之间的创世纪和传播社会陈述的创世纪和传播社会陈述的意义,所提出的实证贡献所提出的受益于相关的教育和健康世界。到目前为止,它涉及新的社会饮食实践,生活方式和世界的观点。在一个受气候变化的世界中,经济危机和越来越多的健康问题,素食主义和素食主义似乎随着现象迅速增长,因为现象提出了关于如何解决一些这些问题的替代少数民族观点。在公开辩论的中心,这两个概念总是更常见的。然而,广泛的媒体覆盖范围留下了划分的舆论,根据他们的共同共识的程度留下了划分的舆论,产生了霸权,解放或争论社会陈述。受到Moscovici的社会代表理论(1961/1976)[1]的启发和他的积极少数群体理论(1976/1979)[2],贡献调查了素食主义者和素食主义者的群体如何看待自己以及剩下的方式如何看待它们在四种不同地质文化背景/大陆的个人/社会饮食环境中的人口,态度和食品偏好的观点,态度和食品偏好:意大利(欧洲),巴西(南美洲)和加拿大(北美)(亚洲)。由De Rosa的建模方法启发的三条相互关联的研究系已经开发了:a)实地研究,管理De Rosa的关联网络技术[4] [5] [5] [6]和一个专门设计的问卷(“社会饮食实践”) 484名参与者,19-55岁,属于5次不同的自我宣布的食物偏好(没有食物限制;肉类爱好者;鱼恋人员;素食主义者); b)传统大众媒体,分析三个国家最多阅读报纸的线版本(Corrie达拉塞拉 - 意大利,Coreio Brazilense -Brazil,多伦多Star-加拿大); c)Web2.0社交媒体分析,调查Instagram和Twitter上的主题相关的用户生成的内容。结果表明,所有国家的素食主义者和素食受试者之间的主要相似性,关于他们搜索信息以及他们如何看待自己的方式,但他们对他们偏好的生活方式,食物和社会影响的看法,取决于文化和文化的方式略有不同他们所居住的国家的经济现实。肉类餐饮者对他们的耐受程度可以根据国家,以及通过自上而下或自下而上的信息结构的群众传统或社交媒体描绘:前代表各种地质文化背景下的大多数食物偏好风格有关的规范性视图,后者作为表达素食主义者等少数群体的渠道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号