首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Advanced Engineering and Technology >Experimental Comparison Between CAV Control and CO_2 Ventilation Control Approaches with respect to energy saving of Air Conditioner
【24h】

Experimental Comparison Between CAV Control and CO_2 Ventilation Control Approaches with respect to energy saving of Air Conditioner

机译:CAV控制与CO_2通风控制方法对空调节能的实验比较

获取原文

摘要

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficiency of the CO_2 control ventilation to enhance energy saving compared with constant air ventilation (CAV) approach of air conditioner. To this end, a small air-conditioner room of 20 square meters was used as the testing room. A carbon dioxide (CO_2) sensor was installed inside to measure indoor air quality while two enthalpy sensors were installed both inside and outside for indoor and outdoor air enthalpies online monitoring. The algorithm of CO_2 control ventilation used is to compare the CO_2 difference between inside and setpoint; when the inside CO_2 concentration is lower than the setpoint, the controller will sent a signal to stop the fresh air intake and exhaust air fans. Measurement was conducted for three indoor temperature set points namely 24, 25 and 26°C. The indoor CO_2 level was set at 900 ppm, 800 ppm, 700 ppm and 600 ppm. The results of measured electrical power consumption showed that CO_2 approach when compared to the CAV approach could save 21.82%, 18.28%, 2.26% and 0.45% and ventilator save 64.19%, 53.4%, 16.8% and 1.26%, for the four CO_2 concentration indoor setpoint considered respectively. Simple mathematical relationships were also derived to estimate the energy saving using the CO_2 control ventilation. This CO_2 control ventilation could be mainly applied for the air condition room of Thailand.
机译:本研究的目的是研究CO_2控制通气的效率,以提高节能与空调的恒定空气通风(CAV)方法相比。为此,使用20平方米的小空调室作为测试室。将二氧化碳(CO_2)传感器安装在内部以测量室内空气质量,而两个焓传感器在内部和外部安装了室内和室外空气焓在线监测。使用的CO_2控制通气算法用于比较内部和设定点之间的CO_2差异;当内部CO_2浓度低于设定点时,控制器将发送信号以停止新鲜进气口和排气风扇。测量三个室内温度设定点即24,25和26℃。室内CO_2级别设定为900 ppm,800 ppm,700 ppm和600 ppm。测量电力消耗的结果表明,与CAV方法相比,CO_2方法可以节省21.82%,18.28%,2.26%和0.45%,呼吸机为四个CO_2浓度节省64.19%,53.4%,16.8%和1.26%室内设定点分别考虑。还导出了简单的数学关系来估计使用CO_2控制通气的节能。该CO_2控制通风可能主要应用于泰国的空调室。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号