首页> 外文会议>Annual International Symposium on Mary Kay O Connor Process Safety Cente >Is my facility at risk? Understanding the risks associated with low burning velocity compounds
【24h】

Is my facility at risk? Understanding the risks associated with low burning velocity compounds

机译:我的设施是否有风险?了解与低燃烧速度化合物相关的风险

获取原文

摘要

A key factor when performing risk assessments and facility siting studies is to assess the explosion and flash fire risk of combustible fluids. There are accurate and established methods to do so when dealing with flammable fluids that have laminar burning velocities (LBVs) around 40 cm/s (e.g., most hydrocarbons). There is currently a need to establish equivalently accurate methods for mildly flammable fluids that have LBVs less than 10 cm/s (e.g., R-32 and ammonia). The use of such fluids is growing, particularly in the heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and refrigeration (HVAC&R) industries as the result of on-going efforts to phase out working fluids with high global warming potential. Without an accurate method of assessing the explosion and flash fire risk of mildly flammable fluids, a very conservative approach is often applied. The approach is to assume the explosion properties of mildly flammable fuels are close to those of methane when evaluating the potential explosion consequences. This will, however, grossly over-predict the potential explosion consequences as flame speed and overpressures during explosions and flash fires are directly correlated to the LBV of the fuel. Furthermore, the likelihood of an explosion or flash fire may also be overpredicted when assuming flammability properties are equivalent to those of methane. Therefore, it is important to not only understand the explosion consequences but also the likelihood of having an explosion, which includes the probability of flammable mixtures forming and subsequently being ignited.
机译:在执行风险评估和设施选址研究时的关键因素是评估可燃液的爆炸和闪光风险。当处理具有大约40cm / s(例如,大多数碳氢化合物)的易燃液体时,有准确和建立的方法可以做到易燃液体(LBV)。目前需要为具有小于10cm / s(例如,R-32和氨)的LBV的温和易燃液来建立等效准确的方法。这种流体的使用正在增长,特别是在加热,通风,空调和制冷(HVAC&R)行业中,因为逐步逐步逐步淘汰具有高全球变暖潜力的工作流体。如果没有准确评估爆炸和闪光风险的准确方法,通常施加非常保守的方法。该方法是假设在评估潜在的爆炸后果时,温和的易燃燃料的爆炸性质接近甲烷。然而,这将粗略地过度预测爆炸期间的火焰速度和过压以及闪光的潜在爆炸后果与燃料的LBV直接相关。此外,爆炸或闪光的可能性也可能在假设可燃性特性与甲烷的易燃性等同于甲烷时呈现过度。因此,重要的是不仅了解爆炸后果,还具有爆炸的可能性,其包括易燃混合物形成和随后被点燃的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号