首页> 外文会议>Australasian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence >Artificial Neural Network: Deep or Broad? An Empirical Study
【24h】

Artificial Neural Network: Deep or Broad? An Empirical Study

机译:人工神经网络:深层或广泛?实证研究

获取原文

摘要

Advent of Deep Learning and the emergence of Big Data has led to renewed interests in the study of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). An ANN is a highly effective classifier that is capable of learning both linear and non-linear boundaries. The number of hidden layers and the number of nodes in each hidden layer (along with many other parameters) in an ANN, is considered to be a model selection problem. With success of deep learning especially on big datasets, there is a prevalent belief in machine learning community that a deep model (that is a model with many number of hidden layers) is preferable. However, this belies earlier theorems proved for ANN that only a single hidden layer (with multiple nodes) is capable of learning any arbitrary function, i.e., a shallow broad ANN. This raises the question of whether one should build a deep network or go for a broad network. In this paper, we do a systematic study of depth and breadth of an ANN in terms of its accuracy (0-1 Loss), bias, variance and convergence performance on 72 standard UCI datasets and we argue that broad ANN has better overall performance than deep ANN.
机译:深度学习的出现和大数据的出现导致人工神经网络(ANN)研究的重新兴趣。 ANN是一种高效的分类器,能够学习线性和非线性边界。隐藏层的数量和ANN中的每个隐藏层中的节点数量(以及许多其他参数)被认为是模型选择问题。随着深度学习的成功,特别是在大型数据集上,在机器学习界中存在普遍存在的信念,即深层模型(即具有许多数量的隐藏层的模型)是优选的。然而,据说早期定理证明,只有单个隐藏层(有多个节点)的ANN能够学习任何任意函数,即浅广域。这提出了一个应该建立深网络或者广泛的网络的问题。在本文中,我们在72个标准UCI数据集中的准确性(0-1损失),偏差,方差和收敛性能方面进行了系统研究,并在72个标准UCI数据集中争辩,我们认为广角有更好的整体性能深处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号