首页> 外文会议>AIAA aerospace sciences meeting >Aerodynamic Analysis of NASA Common Research Model by Block-Structured Cartesian Mesh
【24h】

Aerodynamic Analysis of NASA Common Research Model by Block-Structured Cartesian Mesh

机译:块结构笛卡尔网通的美国宇航局常见研究模型的空气动力学分析

获取原文

摘要

In this study, the aerodynamic analysis of NASA Common Research Model (wing-body configuration) was conducted by a block-structured Cartesian mesh method named Building-Cube method. The building-cube method (BCM) has the advantages of the quick and robust mesh generation and efficient parallel computing, and it is easy to run on a large-scale computing system. However, the BCM suffers a restriction on the resolution of the turbulent boundary layer. The aim of this study is to improve the resolution issue of the turbulent boundary layer at high Reynolds number flows using the immersed boundary method. By utilizing the advantages of the BCM, we challenge to resolve the boundary layer by mesh subdivision. In this paper, the results of the validation before subdivision mesh were shown by using a coarse mesh. The computational results were compared with the transonic wind tunnel test and the results of another flow solver. Although the results showed a similar tendency with the results of another flow solver, the decomposed aerodynamic coefficient appeared with some discrepancy.
机译:在这项研究中,NASA常见研究模型(翼身构造)的空气动力学分析是由名为Cubst-Cube方法的块结构化的笛卡尔网格方法进行的。建筑 - 立方体方法(BCM)具有快速且稳健的网格生成和有效的并行计算的优点,并且易于在大规模计算系统上运行。然而,BCM对湍流边界层的分辨率受到限制。本研究的目的是使用浸没边界法在高雷诺数流动下改善湍流边界层的分辨率问题。通过利用BCM的优点,我们挑战通过网格细分来解析边界层。在本文中,通过使用粗细网格显示了分段网格之前的验证结果。将计算结果与横向风隧道试验和另一个流动求解器的结果进行比较。尽管结果表明了与另一个流动求解器的结果类似的趋势,但是分解的空气动力学系数出现有一些差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号