首页> 外文会议>Annual CHI Conferenceon Human Factors in Computing Systems >How Deceptive are Deceptive Visualizations?: An Empirical Analysis of Common Distortion Techniques
【24h】

How Deceptive are Deceptive Visualizations?: An Empirical Analysis of Common Distortion Techniques

机译:如何欺骗性可视化?:常见变形技术的实证分析

获取原文

摘要

In this paper, we present an empirical analysis of deceptive visualizations. We start with an in-depth analysis of what deception means in the context of data visualization, and categorize deceptive visualizations based on the type of deception they lead to. We identify popular distortion techniques and the type of visualizations those distortions can be applied to, and formalize why deception occurs with those distortions. We create four deceptive visualizations using the selected distortion techniques, and run a crowdsourced user study to identify the deceptiveness of those visualizations. We then present the findings of our study and show how deceptive each of these visual distortion techniques are, and for what kind of questions the misinterpretation occurs. We also analyze individual differences among participants and present the effect of some of those variables on participants' responses. This paper presents a first step in empirically studying deceptive visualizations, and will pave the way for more research in this direction.
机译:在本文中,我们提出了对欺骗性可视化的实证分析。我们开始对数据可视化背景下的欺骗手段进行深入分析,并根据它们导致的欺骗类型进行分类欺骗性可视化。我们识别流行的失真技术,并且可以应用这些失真的可视化类型,并正式确定为什么欺骗与那些扭曲发生欺骗。我们使用所选失真技术创建四个欺骗性可视化,并运行众群用户学习,以识别这些可视化的欺骗性。然后,我们展示了我们的研究结果,并展示了每个这些视觉失真技术的欺骗性,以及误解发生的问题。我们还分析了参与者之间的个体差异,并呈现了一些参与者回应中的一些变量的影响。本文介绍了经验研究欺骗性可视化的第一步,并将在此方向上铺平更多的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号