首页> 外文会议>International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants >Westinghouse AP1000 Electrical Generation Costs - Meeting Marketplace Requirements
【24h】

Westinghouse AP1000 Electrical Generation Costs - Meeting Marketplace Requirements

机译:Westinghouse AP1000发电成本 - 会议市场要求

获取原文

摘要

The re-emergence of nuclear power as a leading contender for new baseload electrical generation is not an occurrence of happenstance. The nuclear industry, in general, and Westinghouse, specifically, have worked diligently with the U.S. power companies and other nuclear industry participants around the world to develop future plant designs and project implementation models that address prior problem areas that led to reduced support for nuclear power. In no particular order, the issues that Westinghouse, as an engineering and equipment supply company, focused on were: safety, plant capital costs, construction schedule reductions, plant availability, and electric generation costs. An examination of the above criteria quickly led to the conclusion that as long as safety is not compromised, simplifying plant designs can lead to positive progress of the desired endpoints for the next and later generations of nuclear units. The distinction between next and later generations relates to the readiness of the plant design for construction implementation. In setting requirement priorities, one axiom is inviolate: There is no exception, nor will there be, to the Golden Rule of business. In the electric power generation industry, once safety goals are met, low generation cost is the requirement that rules, without exception. The emphasis in this paper on distinguishing between next and later generation reactors is based on the recognition that many designs have been purposed for future application, but few have been able to attain the design pedigree required to successfully meet the requirements for next generation nuclear units. One fact is evident: Another generation of noncompetitive nuclear plants will cripple the potential for nuclear to take its place as a major contributor to new electrical generation. Only two plant designs effectively meet the economic tests and demonstrate both unparalleled safety and design credibility due to extensive progress toward engineering completion. These plants are the Westinghouse advanced passive designs- AP600 and AP1000-both of which have verifiable engineering design packages that are more than 50 percent complete
机译:核电作为新的基准发电的主要竞争者的重新出现不是偶然的发生。核工业,总的来说,核工业和西屋专门努力与世界各地的美国电力公司和其他核工业参与者努力开发未来的工厂设计和项目实施模式,这些模型解决了导致对核电的支持减少支持。在没有特别的顺序中,Westinghouse作为工程和设备供应公司的问题,重点是:安全,工厂资本成本,施工时间表减少,植物可用性和发电成本。对上述标准的审查很快导致了结论,只要安全性没有受到损害,简化工厂设计就可以导致下一代和后代核单位的所需终点的积极进展。下一个和后代之间的区别涉及植物设计的施工实施。在设定要求优先事项中,一个公理是不可侵犯的:没有例外,也没有将有关金色的业务规则。在发电业中,一旦满足安全目标,低成本成本是规则的要求,无需异常。本文的重点是区分下一个和后期的反应堆基于识别,即许多设计已被用于未来的应用,但很少有能够获得成功满足下一代核单位要求所需的设计血统。一个事实是明显的:另一代非竞争性核电站将削弱核的潜力将其作为新电发电的主要贡献者。由于工程完成的广泛进展,只有两种植物设计有效符合经济测试,并展示了无与伦比的安全性和设计信誉。这些植物是Westinghouse先进的被动设计 - AP600和AP1000 - 这两者都有可验证的工程设计包,这些包装超过50%

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号