首页> 外文会议>Annual Human Factors and Ergonomics Society of Australia Conference >Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) of Organisational Factors Related to Maintenance Reliability in a Petroleum Production Workplace
【24h】

Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) of Organisational Factors Related to Maintenance Reliability in a Petroleum Production Workplace

机译:石油生产工作场所维护可靠性相关的组织因素的解释现象学分析

获取原文

摘要

Aim: To understand the influence of organisational factors on workplace effectiveness in petroleum processing operations based on perceptions of maintenance technicians. Background: Numerous engineering measures exist for determining the effectiveness of maintenance and reliability of equipment. However, technical measures may not provide sufficient insight into the causes of poor reliability. It is therefore worth improving our understanding of both the human factors specific to this domain, as well as the factors that may influence worker effectiveness in industrial workplaces. Method: Maintenance personnel completed a survey as part of a larger study of maintenance reliability. The survey included the request: "Please write any comments you have on what helps or gets in the way of maintenance work at [target organisation]." These comments were analysed to extract sub-themes using an Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) methodology. Constructs common to these sub-themes were grouped into a smaller number of shared themes and these were used to identify super-ordinate themes. For comparison, a measure was developed to determine the reliability of the facility on which the participant worked. Results: 178 participants completed the survey and 101 (55.6%) submitted a written comment. A total of 57 distinct sub-themes were extracted from the comments, and 12 themes were identified within these sub-themes. The themes were grouped into four super-ordinate themes: 1) Communication and access to information, 2) Efficiency of current work systems, 3) Need for better workgroup support, and 4) Management impacts on the workplace. Differences were identified in the frequency of these overarching themes based on facility reliability level. Conclusion: Comments related to Efficiency of work systems were more frequent from the higher reliability facilities. These comments reflected confidence in the performance of the workplace and a desire for fewer impediments to performing tasks. Views on Management impacts were more frequent from the lowest reliability facilities, reflecting a lack of confidence in management's ability to develop an effective workplace. Comments relating to Communication and the Need for better workgroup support systems were relatively evenly distributed across the lowest, middle and highest reliability facilities, indicating that these were organisation-wide issues, and not specific to a particular reliability level of the workplaces within the organisation.
机译:目的:了解组织因素基于对维护技术人员的看法的石油加工业工作场所效能的影响。背景:存在许多用于确定设备维护和可靠性的有效性的工程措施。但是,技术措施可能无法提供足够的洞察可靠性差的原因。因此,值得改善我们对该领域特定的人为因素的理解,以及可能影响工业工作场所的工人效率的因素。方法:维护人员完成了一项调查,作为对维护可靠性的更大研究的一部分。该调查包括请求:“请写出您对[目标组织]的维护工作方式有所帮助或掌握的任何评论。”分析了这些评论,以利用解释性现象学分析(IPA)方法提取子主题。这些子主题共有的构造被分组为较少数量的共享主题,这些主题用于识别超级纵坐标主题。为了比较,开发了一种措施来确定参与者工作的设施的可靠性。结果:178名参与者完成了调查,101(55.6%)提交了一份书面评论。从评论中提取了总共57个不同的子主题,并在这些子主题中确定了12个主题。这些主题分为四个超级统一主题:1)通信和获取信息,2)当前工作系统的效率,3)需要更好的工作组支持,4)管理对工作场所的管理影响。基于设施可靠性水平,在这些总体主题的频率识别差异。结论:与工作系统效率相关的评论从更高的可靠性设施更频繁。这些评论反映了对工作场所表现的信心,并希望对执行任务的障碍较少。对管理层影响的看法从最低可靠性设施中更频繁地频繁,反映了对管理有效工作场所的缺乏信心。与沟通和更好的工作组支持系统相关的评论相对均匀地分布在最低,中间和最高可靠性设施中,表明这些是整组织的问题,而不是组织内工作场所的特定可靠性水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号