首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems >Thermo economic comparison of conventional micro combined heat and power systems with solid oxide fuel cell systems for small scale applications
【24h】

Thermo economic comparison of conventional micro combined heat and power systems with solid oxide fuel cell systems for small scale applications

机译:常规微综合热量和功率系统具有小规模应用的常规微综合热量和动力系统的热经济比较

获取原文

摘要

Fuel cells have the potential to reduce domestic energy consumption by providing both heat and electricity at the point of use.However,the cost of installing the fuel cell must be sufficiently competitive to be recovered by the savings made over its lifetime.The goal of this paper is to carry out a thermo economic comparison of a conventional micro combined heat and power systems with solid oxide fuel cell systems.A model to estimate the savings and cost targets for solid oxide fuel cell systems is presented.A comparison between fuel cell technologies in the danish market with “state of the art” traditional heat and power generation technologies currently used in Denmark is considered.The conventional method of covering electrical,heating(e.g.hot water)and cooling(e.g.space cooling)load demands is by purchasing electricity from the electricity network grid and with a fossil fuel-fired boiler.The household heat and power demand is evaluated.The lifetime,capital cost is also considered when estimating the resulting target cost.The electrical and thermal efficiency of fuel cell systems is estimated and compared with alternative technologies(i.e.Steriling Engine,Internal combustion engine).By calculating the amount of fuel that would be required by different technologies to heat and power homes,the financial savings that could be realized by adopting SOFC systems are estimated.Among the identified technologies,SOFC systems show the best electrical efficiency and are a better solution in cases where grid connection is not available.
机译:燃料电池具有通过在使用点提供热量和电力来降低国内能源的潜力。然而,安装燃料电池的成本必须足够竞争,以通过在其寿命上储蓄恢复。这个目标纸张采用常规微型热和动力系统的热经济比较,具有固体氧化物燃料电池系统。提出了估计固体氧化物燃料电池系统的节约和成本目标的模型。燃料电池技术之间的比较考虑了“现有技术”的丹麦市场,目前在丹麦中使用的传统热量和发电技术。覆盖电气,加热(Eghot水)和冷却(EGSPACE冷却)负载需求的传统方法是通过购买电力电网栅格和化石燃料锅炉。家庭热量和电力需求评估。寿命,资本成本也被认为是w母鸡估计所产生的目标成本。估计燃料电池系统的电气和热效率与替代技术(Iestering Milit Engine,内燃机)进行比较。根据不同技术来加热和功率所需的燃料量估计通过采用SOFC系统来实现的财务储蓄。鉴定的技术,SOFC系统显示出最佳电效率,并且在网格连接不可用的情况下是更好的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号