首页> 外文会议>Indonesian Petroleum Association Annual Convention >COMPARISON OF WIRELINE FORMATION TESTING AND DRILL STEM TESTING IN COAL BED METHANE RESERVOIRS
【24h】

COMPARISON OF WIRELINE FORMATION TESTING AND DRILL STEM TESTING IN COAL BED METHANE RESERVOIRS

机译:煤层气储层煤层储层钻探钻杆试验的比较

获取原文

摘要

The petroleum industry has been using different types of well testing procedures and technologies in coal bed methane (CBM, also known as Coal Seam Gas (CSG)) wells for many years: for instance -Injection/Falloff (IFO), Drill Stem Test (DST), and Wireline Formation Test (WFT). Evaluation of formation pressure, permeability and skin factor is as important in a CBM reservoir as in any other conventional reservoir for production and economic forecasting. Well testing represents a significant part of the total well cost, especially in Australia. In certain cases, the WFT approach has proven to be a means of reducing costs and saving rig time because it requires less time than DST. The main objective of this paper is to review the conventional pressure transient analysis that is used to interpret WFT and DST build-up transients in the CBM environment. Examples of DST tests from Australia involving partial tubing fill-up followed by shut-in, and of WFT tests, have been evaluated and compared. The paper also discusses some of the abnormal trends in the pressure derivative of the WFT, which can be explained from a CBM geological point of view.
机译:石油工业一直在使用不同类型的煤层甲烷(CBM,也称为煤层气(CSG))井多年:例如 - 注射/衰退(IFO),钻干期试验( DST)和有线形成试验(WFT)。形成压力,渗透性和皮肤因子的评价在CBM储层中的任何其他传统储层在生产和经济预测中的任何其他储层中都很重要。井测试代表了总井成本的重要组成部分,特别是在澳大利亚。在某些情况下,WFT方法已被证明是降低成本和节约钻机时间的手段,因为它需要比DST更少的时间。本文的主要目的是审查传统的压力瞬态分析,用于解释CBM环境中的WFT和DST积聚瞬态。已经评估并比较了涉及部分管填充的澳大利亚DST测试的实例,并进行了综合性,并进行了比较。本文还讨论了WFT的压力衍生物的一些异常趋势,这可以从CBM地质角度解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号