首页> 外文会议>Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering >B2B, B2C AND C2C: SHOULD THEY BE TREATED EQUALLY IN CHINA
【24h】

B2B, B2C AND C2C: SHOULD THEY BE TREATED EQUALLY IN CHINA

机译:B2B,B2C和C2C:它们是否应在中国平等对待

获取原文

摘要

Compared with traditional commerce, ecommerce hastremendous advantages. A seller can easily access worldwide markets despite geographic distance at lower costs, compete with larges companies because of the low barrier to entry, know customers well and then sell more products through tracking purchases and make use of data of customers. According to the different parties in ecommerce activities, ecommerce is divided into three types: B2B (Business-to-Business), B2C (Business-to-Customer) and C2C (Customer-to-Customer). In a complete market, B2B, B2C and C2C shouldn't be treated discriminately. However, in an incomplete and undeveloped environment, such as China, there exist a lot of bottlenecks related to information and cost. With the analysis in the information-and-cost view, it is found out that those obstacles affect B2B, B2C and C2C quite differently and B2B should be given the first rank to develop. Accordingly, policy suggestions are represented.
机译:与传统商务相比,电子商务争夺优势。卖方可以轻松访问全球市场,尽管地理距离以降低成本,而且由于进入的低障碍而与Lirges公司竞争,请通过跟踪购买并利用客户数据来销售更多产品。根据电子商务活动的不同方,电子商务分为三种类型:B2B(商业到业务),B2C(商业对客户)和C2C(客户到客户)。在完整的市场中,不应判别歧视B2B,B2C和C2C。然而,在不完整和未开发的环境中,如中国,存在许多与信息和成本有关的瓶颈。随着信息和成本视图的分析,发现这些障碍物影响B2B,B2C和C2C非常不同,B2B应赋予第一个等级。因此,代表了政策建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号