首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics >Pilot Performance Assessment in Simulators: Exploring Alternative Assessment Methods
【24h】

Pilot Performance Assessment in Simulators: Exploring Alternative Assessment Methods

机译:模拟器中的试点性能评估:探索替代评估方法

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Flight crew performance and competency assessment are daunting tasks requiring expertise and training, and still will not be possible without a certain degree of subjectivity. On the other hand, collecting reliable data on flight crew competencies is at the core of Evidence-based Training, a major modernization of training methodology the industry as a whole has embarked on. Data from assessment informs training departments about where pilots seem to be lacking in proficiency, so those issues can be addressed in initial and recurrent training programmes of airlines. The effectiveness of the training hinges on the quality of the data. Accurate interpretation of the data is crucial for the decisions on training to respond to the true needs of commercial pilots. The industry has made a great effort to develop ways to measure crew performance. The role of Human Factors in incidents and accidents has been known for a long time, and the need to assess and train Human Factors has been identified. In recent years, with the introduction of Evidence Based Training (EBT) there has been a shift in focus from task-based assessment to competence based assessment. This study analysed crew performance in 25 videos from simulator sessions in a high fidelity full flight simulator. A checklist of Desired Flight Crew Performance (DFCP) was used to distinguish between high and low performing crews. Then the performance of selected crews was analysed in detail, using Performance Indicators (PI) as developed in EBT. The findings suggest that while the DFCP method was useful for the classification of high and low performing crews, the PI method provided detailed information for the understanding of underlying factors that affected the performance of the crews. The study also considers the value of using PI to understand and emulate well executed flying and problem solving, to change the focus of training from the study of error and accidents, to training best practices and safe operation.
机译:飞行船员的表现和能力评估是令人生畏的任务,需要专业知识和培训,而且没有一定程度的主观性,仍然无法实现。另一方面,收集有关飞行机组能力的可靠数据是基于证据的培训的核心,这是整个行业培训方法的主要现代化。评估的数据通知培训部门关于飞行员似乎缺乏熟练程度的地方,因此这些问题可以在初始和经常性的航空公司培训方案中解决。培训铰链对数据质量的有效性。准确的对数据的解释对于培训的决定至关重要,以应对商业飞行员的真实需求。该行业努力开发衡量船员表现的方法。人类因素在事故和事故中的作用是很长一段时间的所知,并确定了评估和培训人为因素的必要性。近年来,随着循证培训(EBT)的推出,焦点从基于任务为基础的评估的焦点转变。本研究分析了在高保真全飞行模拟器中的模拟器会话中的25个视频中的船员性能。期望飞行机组性能(DFCP)的清单用于区分高低表演的船员。然后,使用EBT开发的性能指标(PI)详细分析所选工作人员的性能。研究结果表明,虽然DFCP方法对于高低表演机组人员的分类是有用的,但PI方法提供了理解影响船员表现的潜在因素的详细信息。该研究还考虑了使用PI理解和模拟良好的飞行和解决问题的价值,以改变训练训练的焦点,以培训最佳实践和安全操作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号