This paper argues that the latest crisis in the operation of the global economic and financial system needs approached from a new theoretical perspective. Paul Samuelson argued that there were three possible approaches to analysis, comparative static, dynamic and historical. We argue that the first two seemed to have run their course. Historical analysis approaches reality a little closer that the other two and new tools dynamic games, simulation and non-linear mathematics exist to address issues evident in the latest crisis that are not easily addressed from other perspectives.
展开▼
机译：本文认为，全球经济和金融体系经营中的最新危机从新的理论视角接近。 Paul Samuelson认为，分析，比较静态，动态和历史有三种可能的方法。我们争辩说，前两个似乎已经跑了他们的课程。历史分析方法更接近其他两个和新的工具动态游戏，模拟和非线性数学存在，以解决最新危机中不容易从其他角度解决的问题。
展开▼
