首页> 外文会议>International Convention MIPRO >Comparison of Different Classification Methods for Emotion Recognition
【24h】

Comparison of Different Classification Methods for Emotion Recognition

机译:情感识别不同分类方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

The paper presents a comparison of different classification techniques for the task of classifying a speaker's emotional state into one of two classes: aroused and normal. The comparison was conducted using the WEKA (The Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis) open source software which consists of a collection of machine learning algorithms for data mining. The aim of this paper is to investigate the efficiency of different classification methods to recognize the emotional state of a speaker with features obtained by a constraint version of the Maximum Likelihood Linear Regression (CMLLR). For our experiments we adopted the multi-modal AvID database of emotions, which comprises 1708 samples of utterances each lasting at least 15 seconds. The database was randomly divided into a training set and a testing set in a ratio of 5:1. Since there are much more samples in the database belonging to the neutral class than to the aroused class, the latter was over-sampled to ensure that both classes in contained equal numbers of samples in the training set. The build-in WEKA classifiers were divided into five groups based on their theoretical foundation, i.e., the group of classifiers related to the Bayes's theorem, the group of distance-based classifiers, the group of discriminant classifiers, the group of neural networks, and finally the group of decision tree classifiers. From each group we present the results of the best evaluated algorithms with respect to the unweighted average recall.
机译:本文介绍了不同分类技术的比较,使扬声器情绪状态分类为两类中的一个:激起和正常。使用Weka(Waikato环境进行知识分析)开源软件进行了比较,该软件包括一系列数据挖掘的机器学习算法。本文的目的是探讨不同分类方法的效率,以识别通过最大似然线性回归(CMLLR)的约束版本获得的特征的扬声器的情绪状态。对于我们的实验,我们采用了情绪的多模态狂热数据库,其中包括1708个样本,每个话题每个持续至少15秒。数据库被随机分为训练集,并以5:1的比率设定的测试设置。由于数据库中属于中立类的数据库中的样本,而不是引起的类,因此后者被过度采样,以确保在训练集中包含相同数量的样本中的两个类。基于其理论基础,即与贝叶斯定理,基于距离的分类器组,判别群组组,神经网络组,神经网络组,神经网络集团,神经网络集团,神经网络集团和神经网络组的分类器组分为五个群体。最后是决策树分类器的组。从每个组来,我们介绍了关于未加权的平均召回的最佳评估算​​法的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号