首页> 外文会议>International Seminar on Paste and Thickened Tailings >Large piston diaphragm pumps as a feasible alternative to multistage centrifugal slurry pumps
【24h】

Large piston diaphragm pumps as a feasible alternative to multistage centrifugal slurry pumps

机译:大型活塞隔膜泵作为多级离心浆料泵的可行替代品

获取原文

摘要

To transfer abrasive slurries through pipelines, generally two types of pumps are used: piston diaphragm pumps for low volumes of slurry against high pressures, and multistage centrifugal pumps for high volumes against low pressures.The discharge pressure of centrifugal slurry pumps is usually limited to 4 to 7 bars per pump. To achieve higher pressures, multiple centrifugal pumps are placed in series, either in a single pump station or in several pump stations, which are placed along the pipeline depending on the overall pressure required. For example, a total system pressure of 60 bars would require approximately eight pumps in series. The maximum flow capacity of these pumps can be close to 10,000 m~3/hr. The capacity of piston diaphragm pumps has historically been limited to approximately 750 m~3/h per unit and therefore multiple pumps placed in parallel are needed to match the capacity of large centrifugal pumps. Typically a high flow rate piston diaphragm pump station would therefore be equipped with five or six units operating in parallel.Using piston diaphragm pumps for slurry transfer has a number of potential advantages when compared to centrifugal pumps, resulting particularly from piston diaphragm pumps delivering constant flow independent of discharge pressure, and generally the need for only a single pump station. There are also potential benefits to be achieved in efficiency and availability, as well as spare parts consumption. A new size of piston diaphragm pump has become available which may prove to be a feasible alternative for multistage centrifugal pump systems. This new design offers a unit capacity of 1,200 m~3/h at a discharge pressure of up to 80 bars.This paper describes the result of a feasibility comparison, including CAPEX and OPEX costing between this new large piston diaphragm pump system and a multistage centrifugal pump system.
机译:为了通过管道转移磨料浆料,通常使用两种类型的泵:活塞隔膜泵用于低压力的低压浆料,以及用于低压的高卷的多级离心泵。离心浆料泵的排放压力通常限制为4每个泵到7个酒吧。为了实现更高的压力,多个离心泵串联串联,在单个泵站或几个泵站中,根据所需的总压力沿着管道放置。例如,60巴的总系统压力需要串联大约8个泵。这些泵的最大流量可接近10,000 m〜3 / hr。活塞隔膜泵的容量历史上限制在每单位约750 m〜3 / h,因此需要并行放置的多个泵,以匹配大型离心泵的容量。通常,高流量活塞隔膜泵站将配备五个或六个单位并联操作。与离心泵相比,用于浆料转移的活塞隔膜泵具有许多潜在的优势,特别是从输送恒定流动的活塞膜片泵。独立于放电压力,并且通常只需要一个单个泵站。效率和可用性以及备件消耗也有潜在的好处。一种新的活塞隔膜泵泵已经可用,这可能证明是多级离心泵系统的可行替代方案。这种新设计提供1,200米〜3 / h的单位容量,可在最多80巴的排放压力下提供1,200 m〜3 / h.本文介绍了可行性比较的结果,包括该新型大型活塞隔膜泵系统与多级的CAPEX和OPEX成本。离心泵系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号