首页> 外文会议>Annual Meetings of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation >COAL MINE RECLAMATION IN THE SOUTHERN APPALACHAINS: COSTS OF FORESTRY VERSUS HAYLAND/PASTURE
【24h】

COAL MINE RECLAMATION IN THE SOUTHERN APPALACHAINS: COSTS OF FORESTRY VERSUS HAYLAND/PASTURE

机译:南阿巴拉契亚人的煤矿垦区:林业的成本与干草和/牧场

获取原文

摘要

The two most common options for post-mining land uses in the southern Appalachians are hayland/pasture or forestry. Hayland/pasture has become the predominant reclamation type due to strict regulation standards requiring quick and dense erosion control by herbaceous cover. Recently, more landowners have become interested in returning mined land to an economically valuable post-mining land use. Current research has provided the biological and technical information needed to reclaim mine lands to productive forest stands and achieve bond release. Cost information though has been lacking or variable at best. The purpose of this study was to understand the processes of reclamation for both forestry and hayland/pasture, and calculate detailed cost estimates for both reclamation types. Total costs of reclamation were determined using a cost-engineering method in conjunction with Office of Surface Mining Regulation and Enforcement bond-calculation worksheets. In all states analyzed, pasture reclamation was more costly on a per acre basis. In Ohio, reclamation costs differed by only 50 dollars per acre between pasture and forestry reclamation. On the high end, reclamation costs differed by nearly 500 dollars per acre for pasture versus forestry in West Virginia. Grading costs have the greatest impact on the difference between forestry and pasture reclamation. Forestry reclamation should involve only grading the site with one dozer pass to prevent compaction of minesoils which inhibits tree growth. Pasture reclamation requires more grading passes to prepare the seedbed, requiring four passes. Herbaceous seeding costs were higher for pasture reclamation due to higher application rates, but differences were not as substantial as the cost of grading. Fertilizer and lime costs were not substantively different between forestry and pasture reclamation. These cost estimates provide useful tools for mine operators and landowners to determine the most economical and suitable post-mining land use for their individual property.
机译:南方阿巴拉契亚人南部挖掘土地使用的两种最常见的选择是海兰/牧场或林业。由于严格的监管标准,Hayland / Pasture已成为主要的填海型,这是由草本覆盖的严格的调节标准进行快速和密集的侵蚀控制。最近,更多的土地所有者对将矿山返回到经济的挖掘后土地利用感兴趣。目前的研究提供了将矿山土地的生物学和技术信息提供给生产森林的成立并实现债券发布。成本信息尽管缺乏或最佳变量。本研究的目的是了解林业和海地/牧场的填海过程,并计算两种填海类型的详细成本估算。使用成本工程方法与表面挖掘监管办公室和执法债券计算工作表一起确定填海的总成本。在分析的所有国家,牧场填海素均昂贵地昂贵。在俄亥俄州,牧场和林业填海之间的填海费用仅为每英亩50美元。在高端,牧场与西弗吉尼亚州的牧场与林业相比,填海费用近500美元。评分成本对林业和牧场填海区之间的差异产生了最大的影响。林业填海综合应涉及只有一个戴策刀通过的位点,以防止压缩抑制树木生长的细菌。牧场填海需要更多的分级通过来准备苗床,需要四次通过。由于施加率较高,牧草填海的草本播种成本较高,但差异并不像分级成本一样大幅大幅增加。林业和牧场垦区之间的肥料和石灰成本在林业和牧场垦区之间没有实质性不同。这些成本估计为矿山运营商和土地所有者提供了有用的工具,以确定其个人财产的最经济和适当的挖掘后土地利用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号