首页> 外文会议>International Technical Meeting of Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation >PANNEL DISCUSSION Common Frequencies vs. Frequency Diversity in Civil Signals-What is the Right choice? - (PPT)
【24h】

PANNEL DISCUSSION Common Frequencies vs. Frequency Diversity in Civil Signals-What is the Right choice? - (PPT)

机译:面板讨论公共频率与民用信号中的频率分集 - 什么是正确的选择? - (PPT)

获取原文

摘要

Common Frequencies or Frequency Diversity 1. Common frequencies are generally desirable (1). They simplify receiver design (not that significant with modern circuit design capabilities) (2). Can also simplify antenna design (nearby frequencies are not a problem) 2. Frequency diversity could be beneficial in some situations (3). In the presence of jamming the diversity of frequencies in the different systems might allow continued operation 3. The maximum spacing of the frequency separation is more important than commonality.
机译:常见频率或频率分集1.通常需要公共频率(1)。他们简化了接收器设计(与现代电路设计能力没有重要)(2)。还可以简化天线设计(附近的频率不是问题)2。在某些情况下,频率分集​​可能是有益的(3)。在干扰不同系统中的频率的多样性可能允许继续操作3.频率分离的最大间距比共度更重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号