首页> 外文会议>World Petroleum Congress >Renewable Energies Versus CCS Energy Efficient Technologies; Which One to Subsidize for Sustainable Energy Supply Cleaner Environment?(PPT)
【24h】

Renewable Energies Versus CCS Energy Efficient Technologies; Which One to Subsidize for Sustainable Energy Supply Cleaner Environment?(PPT)

机译:可再生能源与CCS和节能技术;哪一个补贴可持续的能源供应和清洁环境?(PPT)

获取原文

摘要

Renewable energies are energies that come from naturally occurring and theoretically inexhaustible sources of energy which are continually replenished and currently provide less than 14% of total primary energy in the world. While there is hope for renewables to get higher share in energy mix during future decades, we face severe challenges and doubts regarding possibility of a 'sustainable supply' of energy by renewable sources. Renewable energies technologies are some of the fastest growing in the world but they are still not matured, are costly and complicated to develop. Environmental doubts come to mind when we expect renewable energies to resolve environmental concerns. Currently they do not eliminate greenhouse gas emissions and conventional air pollution, as manufacturing, transporting and operating them produce some emissions, consume water and disrupt land use and wildlife habitats. An increase in oil prices have a statistically positive impact on most renewable energy project returns but this means that the renewable energy sector is substantially more risky and dependent on oil and gas price fluctuations. Low oil prices and continual development of shale gas can speedily turn the renewable industry into quite a difficult financial position and even bankruptcy for private investors. Financial worries pursue when we observe for the first time in several years; 2012 saw a decline for global investment in renewable energy because of economic crisis as well as uncertainty over support policies in Europe and the US. Renewables still are quite reliant on government subsidies to survive. The past progress of renewable projects shows high dependency on government and private support in form of giving subsidies or exemption from tax, put on other energy sources (such as carbon tax). So here a valid question is: In case shale gas proves to be plentiful, accessible and cheap, wouldn't it be sensible to put much more money on CCS and energy efficiency projects than renewable energies to decrease the investment risks and also to meet environmental obligations of some western countries? This article seeks to help energy policy makers in governmental agencies or private, set forth effective and practical approaches in securing energy supply, as well as preserving the environment by mobilizing their aid from low influential renewable energies toward higher yielding hydrocarbon technologies that can faster and better change the global energy portfolio into cleaner and environmentally friendly supply. We evaluate the different risks, limiting factors and concerns which are currently inherent in development of renewables and discuss possible solutions, such as more investment in CCS and energy efficiency projects (in which OPEC and other producing countries could also participate to create a new energy dialogue with consuming countries), to minimize the level of risk associated with our future energy supply and toward a sustainable management of energy market.
机译:可再生能源是来自自然发生的和理论上取之不尽的能源来源的能量,这是不断补充的,目前在世界上占总精力的14%。虽然希望可再生能够在未来数十年中获得更高的能源混合份额,但我们面临严峻的挑战,并对可再生来源进行“可持续供应”的可能性。可再生能源技术是世界上增长最快的一些,但它们仍然没有成熟,昂贵而且复杂发展。当我们期望可再生能源来解决环境问题时,致力于环境疑虑。目前他们不会消除温室气体排放和传统的空气污染,因为制造,运输和操作它们产生一些排放,消耗水和破坏土地利用和野生动物栖息地。油价的增加对大多数可再生能源项目的回报有统计积极影响,但这意味着可再生能源部门的风险大幅度更大,依赖石油和燃气价格波动。低油价和页岩气的不断发展可以迅速将可再生产业转化为相当困难的财务状况,甚至对私人投资者破产。当我们在几年内首次观察时,财务担忧追求;由于经济危机,2012年对可再生能源的全球投资的下降以及欧洲和美国的支持政策不确定性。可再生能源仍然依赖政府补贴以生存。可再生项目的过去进展表现出对政府和私人支持的高度依赖,以提供补贴或免税,提出其他能源(如碳税)。所以这里有一个有效的问题是:如果页岩气体证明是丰富,可靠和便宜的,不能比可再生能源在可再生能源下减少投资风险,并且还可以明智地为CCS和能源效率的项目进行更加明智。一些西方国家的义务?本文旨在帮助政府机构或私人能源政策制定者,并在确保能源供应方面规定有效和实用的方法,并通过从低影响力的可再生能源调动更高的碳氢化合物技术来保护环境,以便更高的碳氢化合物技术来保护环境将全球能源组合更改为清洁和环保供应。我们评估目前在开发可再生能源和讨论可能的解决方案的不同风险,限制因素和担忧,例如对CCS和能源效率项目的更多投资(其中欧佩克和其他生产国也可以参与创造新的能源对话与消费国家),尽量减少与未来能源供应相关的风险水平,并朝着能源市场的可持续管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号