首页> 外文会议>Annual world conference of the Air Transport Research Society >AN EXPERIMENT TO MEASURE SIMULATOR-BASED AIRPLANE UPSET RECOVERY TRAINING TRANSFER: PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF PHASE TWO FLIGHT TESTING
【24h】

AN EXPERIMENT TO MEASURE SIMULATOR-BASED AIRPLANE UPSET RECOVERY TRAINING TRANSFER: PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF PHASE TWO FLIGHT TESTING

机译:一种测量模拟器的飞机镦锻回收训练转移的实验:两相飞行试验的初步结果

获取原文

摘要

Airplane upsets leading to loss of control (LOC) are a leading cause of air transport as well as general aviation fatal accidents. As a consequence, air transport pilots receive ab initio and recurrent upset recovery training in Level D simulators. However, little evidence exists to support the hypothesis that simulator training improves a pilot's ability to recover an actual airplane from a serious upset. We report on an FAA funded research experiment to evaluate the effectiveness of low-cost simulator-based upset recovery training. A 2×4 mixed factorial design allows us to compare in-flight upset recovery performance of trained and control group pilot participants over a variety of dependent variables. During Phase One flight testing, trained pilot outperformed control group pilots in areas such as time to recover from an upset, proper throttle management, roll control input, and appropriate application of G forces. However, there was no statistical difference between trained and control group pilots in the most important performance parameter-altitude loss during upset recovery maneuvering. In Phase Two flight testing, completed in April 2008, a new group of trained pilots outperformed new control group pilots in altitude loss as well. Nevertheless, trained pilot performance with respect to altitude loss was not close to optimal. We present and interpret preliminary results of Phase Two testing and discuss their implications with respect to air transport upset recovery training programs.
机译:飞机上升导致控制丧失(LOC)是航空运输的主要原因以及普通航空致命事故。因此,航空运输飞行员在D级模拟器中接受AB Initio和反复扰乱恢复培训。然而,很少有证据支持模拟器培训改善飞行员从严重沮丧恢复实际飞机的能力的假设。我们报告了FAA资助的研究实验,以评估低成本模拟器的恢复培训的有效性。 A 2×4混合阶乘设计使我们能够在各种相关变量上比较训练有素的训练和控制组试点参与者的飞行恢复性能。在一阶段飞行测试期间,培训的试验飞行员在诸如时间恢复的区域中的训练有素的控制组飞行员在令人沮丧,适当的节流管理,滚动控制输入和适当应用G力中恢复。然而,在扰乱恢复机动期间,训练有素和对照组飞行员之间没有统计差异,培训和控制组飞行员在最重要的表现参数 - 高度损失中。在两次飞行试验中,在2008年4月完成的一组新的训练有素的飞行员也在高度损失中表现出新的对照组飞行员。尽管如此,训练有素的飞行员性能相对于高度损失没有接近最佳。我们展示并解释了第二阶段测试的初步结果,并讨论了对空运不安恢复培训计划的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号