首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated adn Recalcitrant Compounds >Lyne and McLachlan (1949): An Unrecognized Publication on Groundwater Contamination by Trichloroethene?(Abstract)
【24h】

Lyne and McLachlan (1949): An Unrecognized Publication on Groundwater Contamination by Trichloroethene?(Abstract)

机译:Lyne和McLachlan(1949年):一种通过三氯乙烯的地下水污染的未被识别的出版物?(摘要)

获取原文

摘要

The investigation and remediation of groundwater contamination by chlorinated sol- vents have become extremely costly undertakings, particularly at sites contaminated by DNAPL (dense non-aqueous phase liquid). In addition, property damage and personal injuries are often claimed to have resulted from such groundwater contamination. Assign- ing liabilities to the responsible parties is hence a significant and often contentious step. Although controlling legislation and case law vary internationally, similar pivotal ques- tions often arise. What was the knowledge base regarding potential contamination at the time of the pollution incident? What was the alleged polluter’s awareness of the specific incident? Could the alleged polluter have reasonably foreseen the consequences of their chemical handling or waste disposal activities? To address such questions, it has become common practice to review historic published scientific, engineering and regulatory literature to gauge the level of understanding during the relevant time period, of the potential contamination problems. Establishing the nature and availability of relevant literature at the time of such incidents is hence a key task. Literature, however, can become overlooked, its significance unrecognized, and hence may fade from view or be essentially lost. The emergence of such ‘faded or lost literature’ at a later time may prove divisive raising several points for debate. Was the literature truly lost? Did the literature raise any awareness of a pollution issue and was that awareness significant? As chlorin- ated solvents such as trichloroethene (TCE) have been used by industry since the 1930s, there is potential for many current solvent-contaminated sites to contain a DNAPL pollu- tion legacy arising from spillages decades previous. The emergence of relevant historic, faded or lost literature may assume some importance in such cases, particularly in the relation to the potential apportionment of liabilities.
机译:氯化溶剂的地下水污染的调查和修复已经变得非常昂贵,特别是在由DNAPL(致密的非水相液)污染的地点。此外,往往宣称损害的财产损失和个人伤害是由这种地下水污染引起的。为负责任方为负债分配负债是一个重要且经常有争议的步骤。虽然控制立法和案例法在国际上变化,但通常会出现类似的枢轴问题。关于污染事件时潜在污染的知识基础是什么?涉嫌污染者对特定事件的认识是什么?所谓的污染者可以合理地预见到化学处理或废物处理活动的后果吗?为了解决这些问题,它已成为普遍的做法,审查历史性出版的科学,工程和管理文学来衡量在相关时间段理解的潜在污染问题,该水平。在此事件时建立相关文献的性质和可用性,因此是一个关键任务。然而,文学可能会被忽视,其意义无法识别,因此可能会从视野中淡出或基本上丢失。在以后的时间内,这种“褪色或失去的文学”的出现可能会证明分裂筹集了几点争论。文学真的迷失了吗?文献是否提出了对污染问题的任何意识,这是一个意识的重要性?由于20世纪30年代以来,由于行业使用氯乙烯(TCE)如三氯乙烯(TCE),可能有许多目前溶剂污染的位点含有溢出溢出的DNAPL污染遗产。在这种情况下,相关历史,褪色或失物文学的出现可能会在这种情况下承担一些重要性,特别是在与潜在负债分配的关系中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号