首页> 外文会议>European Conference on Materials and Structures in Aerospace >Residual strength prediction of integral structures using numerical crack extension analyses
【24h】

Residual strength prediction of integral structures using numerical crack extension analyses

机译:数值裂缝延伸分析的整体结构的残余强度预测

获取原文

摘要

The residual strength of an Aluminium panel with five stringers, which contained a crack that divided the central stringer, was to be predicted during a Round Robin organised by ASTM. The initial crack tips were right ahead of the stringers #2 and #4, respectively, so that crack branching along the skin and into the stringers occurred after initiation. The prediction has been achieved using finite element simulations including crack extension, for which a cohesive model was utilised. Conventional material properties, yield and ultimate strength as well as experimental results from M(T) specimens in terms of force, COD and Δα, were given. The residual strength prediction was performed in two steps: First the crack extension parameters for the cohesive model, the cohesive strength, T_0, and the cohesive energy, Γ_0, were determined by numerical reproduction of the results of the M(T) specimen. With the optimised parameters, the five-stringer panel was modelled. These steps were conducted by two different finite element models: a shell and a 3D finite element mesh. It turned out that it is possible to analyse the structure with both models. In the 3D case, the residual strength prediction was conservative and the deviation of the predicted from the experimental value was below 9%. The results of the shell simulation were even closer to the experiment (deviation approximately 3%), but the simulation was non-conservative.
机译:用五个桁条的铝面板的剩余强度,其中包含划分中心纵梁的裂缝,在由ASTM组织的循环罗宾期间将预测。初始裂缝尖端分别在桁条#2和#4的前方,使得沿着皮肤分支并在启动后发生突破口。使用包括裂缝延伸的有限元模拟已经实现了预测,利用了粘性模型。给出了常规材料特性,产率和极限强度以及在力,鳕鱼和Δα中的M(t)样本的实验结果。通过数值再现M(T)样本的数值再现,首先进行残余强度预测:首先,粘性模型的裂缝延伸参数,内聚强度,T_0和粘性能量γ_0确定。使用优化的参数,为五纵梁面板进行了建模。这些步骤由两个不同的有限元模型进行:壳牌和3D有限元啮合。事实证明,可以使用两个模型分析结构。在3D情况下,残留强度预测是保守的,并且预测到实验值的偏差低于9%。壳模拟的结果甚至更接近实验(偏差约3%),但模拟是非保守的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号