首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services >Regulatory Issues in the Water Sector. Which Institutions Matter Most?
【24h】

Regulatory Issues in the Water Sector. Which Institutions Matter Most?

机译:水部门的监管问题。哪些机构最重要?

获取原文

摘要

IF we look at the deregulation movement of the last 25 years or so, the pace of reform in the water sector has been remarkably slow, and changes likely the less radical among public utilities. Water was never deregulated. Even in the most spectacular reforms, like the one implemented in the U.K. at the end of the 1980s, the sector remained heavily regulated. Moreover, there was never a significant move towards privatization. At most there has been private participation, supervised by a very visible public hand. A recent survey of 973 major urban water and sanitation systems in developing countries showed only 136 of them involving private sector participation, with divestitures constituting 10 percent of this subset, while 66 percent were concessions, 19 percent management contracts, and the remaining 5 percent leases or 'affermages' [3, p. 16].
机译:如果我们看看过去25年左右的放松管制运动,水部门的改革步伐非常慢,并且可能发生变化的公用事业之间的激进。水从未放松过。即使在最壮观的改革中,就像在U.K的那样。在20世纪80年代末,该部门仍然受到严重监管。此外,从来没有重大促进私有化。最多有私人参与,由一个非常可见的公众监督。最近对发展中国家的973个主要城市水和卫生系统的调查显示,其中只有136个涉及私营部门参与,潜水率构成了这一子集的10%,而66%是让步,19%的管理合同,其余5%的租赁或'indermages'[3,p。 16]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号