首页> 外文会议>Annual International Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers >Appropriate Personal Protective Equipment: Pesticide Label Requirements or Safety Data Sheet Requirements
【24h】

Appropriate Personal Protective Equipment: Pesticide Label Requirements or Safety Data Sheet Requirements

机译:适当的个人防护装备:农药标签要求或安全数据表要求

获取原文

摘要

The Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) have in the past and continue to be the standard safety references for chemical products. Revised MSDS documents are now referred to as Safety Data Sheets (SDS) and these references include numerous safety requirements such as personal protective equipment (PPE) that are also listed on the corresponding pesticide labels. In some instances the requirements on the SDS (MSDS) references have a different protective requirements listed for PPE than what appears on the pesticide label for identical products. This presents some confusion for applicators and handlers when determining which set of requirements offers the appropriate level of personal protection for pesticide applicators and handlers. This is of particular importance when PPE list include respirators and the two references have differ in requirements. Previous research suggests that safety warnings must be understood by the intended target audience to be effective. The inconsistencies between pesticidelabels and SDS documents could increase risks to applicators and handlers. This inconsistency is further complicated by the changes proposed for the Worker Protection Standard (WPS). Under the proposed WPS changes, OSHA standards which are reflected on SDS documents, must be adopted for respirator requirements. Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), SDS (MSDS) requirements that conflict with the FIFRA approved pesticide label requirements will be problematic. To provide clarification and compliance guidance, the EPA has recommended that pesticide registrants insert FIFRA label information and a brief explanation of any differences on the corresponding SDS. For their health and safety, it is critical for pesticide applicators and handlers to understand pesticide personal protective information. The reading, comprehension, and compliance with of pesticide labels has in the past been problematic for agricultural producers and workers and this will be further complicated bythe proposed WPS requirements. Data are reported on training activities supported by a NIOSH agricultural safety and health center pilot project funding. Continued education and training is needed to assure that people exposed to pesticides use appropriate PPE.
机译:材料安全数据表(MSDS)在过去,继续成为化学产品的标准安全参考。修订后的MSDS文件现已被称为安全数据表(SDS),这些参考文献包括许多安全要求,如个人防护设备(PPE),也在相应的农药标签上列出。在某些情况下,SDS(MSDS)参考的要求具有针对PPE的不同保护性要求,而不是在农药标签上出现的相同产品。这对涂抹器和处理程序提供了一些困惑,当确定哪一套要求提供适当的杀虫剂施工器和处理程序的个人保护。当PPE列表包括呼吸器时,这是特别重要的,并且两种参考要求有所不同。以前的研究表明,必须通过预期的目标受众来理解安全警告是有效的。 PhesticIdeLabels和SDS文件之间的不一致可能会增加申请人和处理程序的风险。对于工人保护标准(WPS)提出的更改,这种不一致进一步复杂化。根据拟议的WPS变更,必须采用对SDS文件反映的OSHA标准进行呼吸器要求。根据联邦杀虫剂,杀菌剂和鼠李肽(FIFRA),SDS(MSDS)与FIFRA批准的农药标签要求冲突的要求将是有问题的。为了提供澄清和合规指导,EPA建议农药注册人插入FIFRA标签信息,并简要说明对应SDS的任何差异。为了他们的健康和安全,对农药施用者和处理人员来说至关重要,了解农药个人保护信息。对农药标签的阅读,理解和遵守对农业生产者和工人有问题,这将进一步复杂化为拟议的WPS要求。报告了Niosh农业安全和保健中心试点项目资助支持的培训活动。需要继续教育和培训,以确保暴露于农药的人使用适当的PPE。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号