首页> 外文会议>Annual International Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers >Effect of Amount and Timing of Subsurface Drip Irrigation on Corn Production
【24h】

Effect of Amount and Timing of Subsurface Drip Irrigation on Corn Production

机译:地下滴灌灌溉量与时序对玉米产量的影响

获取原文

摘要

Subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) has the potential of being a more efficient irrigation system compared to systems such as center pivot and furrow irrigation. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the amount and timing of irrigation, using SDI, on corn (Zea mays) production. A field study was conducted at North Platte, Nebraska in 2007 and 2008, using two SDI systems. The study was replicated eight times on the older SDI system (SDH) and four times on the newer SDI system (SDI2).On SDH, there were nine treatments to impose different irrigation regimes, ranging from dryland to fully irrigated. Five of the nine treatments allowed water stress only after tasseling and silking. On SDI2, there were eight treatments that were very similar to the nine on SDH. In 2007, on SDH, mean corn yield ranged from 7.8 Mg ha~(-1) with a season total of 57 mm of irrigation water to 11.1 Mg ha~(-1) for the fully irrigated treatment (253 mm of irrigation water). On SDI2, yield increased from 8.9 Mgha~(-1) with 41 mm to 11.5 Mg ha~(-1) with 264 mm (fully irrigated). The least-irrigated treatment (158 mm) of the four treatments allowing water stress only after tasseling and silking, had a mean yield of 10.9 Mg ha~(-1), only 0.6 Mg ha~(-1) less thanthe fully irrigated treatment (264 mm). Soil water content fell well below 0.20 m~3 m~(-3) (below 50% depletion of soil available water) in the second part of August and in September for the former treatment (158 mm), suggesting that some drying out ofthe soil below 50% depletion towards the end of the growing season causes only a modest reduction in corn yield. In 2008, yields were suppressed across the irrigation treatments. Amount or timing of irrigation did not have much of an effect on yields, except for the dryland treatment where yield was substantially less than for the other treatments. Water conservation with SDI has the potential to help irrigators to significantly reduce pumping cost and more water would be available for competing needs.More research is needed to document and quantify this water conservation potential of SDI.
机译:与中心枢轴和沟灌等系统相比,地下滴灌(SDI)具有更有效的灌溉系统的可能性。本研究的目的是确定灌溉量和时序的效果,使用SDI,玉米(Zea Mays)生产。使用两个SDI系统,在2007年和2008年在内布拉斯加州北普拉特,2008年进行了一个田间研究。该研究在较旧的SDI系统(SDH)上复制了八次,并在较新的SDI系统(SDI2).on SDH上进行了四次,有9种治疗方法,以施加不同的灌溉制度,从旱地灌溉到完全灌溉。在流苏和丝绸之后,九个治疗中的五种允许水分胁迫。在SDI2上,存在八种治疗方法与SDH上的九个非常相似。 2007年,在SDH上,平均玉米产量从7.8 mg HA〜(-1)范围为3.8 mg Ha〜(-1),季节灌溉水57毫米灌溉水至11.1mg ha〜(-1),用于全灌溉治疗(253毫米灌溉水) 。在SDI2上,产率从8.9毫氏〜(-1)增加,41毫米至11.5mg HA〜(-1),264毫米(完全灌溉)。灌注治疗(158毫米)的四种治疗方法仅允许水分胁迫,速度均匀,平均产量为10.9mg ha〜(-1),只有0.6mg ha〜(-1)少灌注治疗(264毫米)。土壤含水量低于0.20米〜3 m〜(3)(八月的50%低于50%),并于9月份为前治疗(158毫米),暗示一些干燥在生长季节结束时,土壤低于50%的枯竭导致玉米产量的适度降低。 2008年,在灌溉治疗中抑制了产量。除了旱地治疗外,灌溉量或时间对产量没有大部分影响,其中产率大于其他处理。使用SDI的水资源保护有可能帮助灌溉者显着降低泵送成本,并且可以使用更多的水来竞争需求。需要研究并量化SDI的这种水资源保护潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号