首页> 外文会议>Annual International Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers >Repeatability of Soil Apparent Electrical Conductivity Measured by the Veris 3100 Sensor
【24h】

Repeatability of Soil Apparent Electrical Conductivity Measured by the Veris 3100 Sensor

机译:通过VeriS 3100传感器测量的土壤表观电导率的可重复性

获取原文

摘要

Repeatability of a measurement can be assessed by characterizing the variation between successive measurements of the same quantity. Apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) offers advantages for mapping soil variability because detailed data can be colleted easily and inexpensively using on-the-go EC sensors; however, there has been little research investigating the repeatability of these sensors. The objective of this study was to evaluate the repeatability of the coulter sensor by comparing ECa datafrom two passes in barley stubble at two 1.6-ha sites, one with a sandy loam soil texture (Nesson) and the other a clay loam soil texture (EARC). The ECa measurements from both passes were compared at shallow (0-30 cm) and deep (0-90 cm) soil depths. The CVs of ECa measurements for shallow and deep depths from passl were higher than those from pass2 at both sites. The (RMSE values of ECa measurements between passl and pass2 at shallow and deep depths for the Nesson site were 0.76 and 0.51, respectively, while, the RMSE for the EARC site were 4.06 and 2.93 at shallow and deep depths, respectively. The repeatability was evaluated using a 95% confidence interval for the difference between ECa measurements of the two passes. Results demonstrate marginallyunacceptable repeatability between the two passes at shallow depth for both sites and acceptable repeatability at deep depths. The reasons for lack of agreement between passl and pass2 in ECa measurements at shallow depths could have resulted from soildisturbance and compaction caused by the coulter sensor during passl process.
机译:可以通过表征相同数量的连续测量之间的变化来评估测量的可重复性。表观电导率(ECA)提供了用于映射土壤变异性的优点,因为可以轻松且廉价地使用ON-TO-ON EC传感器抵碎的详细数据;然而,研究了研究这些传感器的可重复性的研究。本研究的目的是通过将MECA DataFrom在两个1.6-HA网站上的大麦茬中的两次通过,评估Coulter传感器的可重复性,其中一个带有砂质壤土土壤纹理(Nesson)和另一个粘土壤土土壤纹理(EARC )。在浅(0-30厘米)和深(0-90厘米)的土壤深度下比较了两次通过的ECA测量。来自Passl的浅层和深度深度的ECA测量的CV均高于来自两个站点的Pass2的CV。 (Passl和Pass2之间的ECA测量的RMSE值分别为0.76和0.51,而EARC位点的RMSE分别为4.06和2.93,分别在浅层和深度深处。可重复性是使用95%置信区间进行评估,用于两次通过的ECA测量值之间的差异。结果证明了两个在浅层深度之间的Marginally不可接受的可重复性,在深度深度和深度深度的可接受的可重复性。Passl与Pass2之间缺乏协议的原因浅深度的ECA测量可能是由PISLL过程中由Coulter传感器引起的太阳孔和压实引起的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号