首页> 外文会议>SPE Middle East Oil Gas Show and Conference >Determination of True Formation Resistivity from LWD Conventional Resistivity Measurements in a Horizontal Well
【24h】

Determination of True Formation Resistivity from LWD Conventional Resistivity Measurements in a Horizontal Well

机译:测定水平井的LWD常规电阻率测量的真实形成电阻率

获取原文

摘要

In a horizontal well, apparent resistivity curves often show varied separations and increased values due to the polarization horn effects near a boundary and other effects such as adjacent beds or anisotropy. The true formation resistivity (Rt) is uncertain and can be mis-interpreted. As a consequence, saturation estimates are uncertain so that the reserves cannot be accurately predicted. A full inversion can be used to derive the true Rt. However, the instability of an inversion due to the lack of measurement variation along the measured depth makes the Rt derivation very challenging. To determine a true Rt from the logging-while-drilling (LWD) resistivity measurements, a general full inversion is usually time-consuming and needs some inputs on formation model. This paper presents an alternative approach to derive the true Rt without input of any prior information. The alternative approach uses a simple two-layer model for the removal of horn effects and derives a solution at two steps: a) inverting resistivities of the two layers at each distance away from the boundary; b) selecting a solution with specific constraints such as using statistics in a moving window and internally consistent physical constraints to make the solution more reliable. In the first step, neural networks are developed to calculate tool responses and derivatives for the savings of computation time and memory needs. Synthetic examples show that true Rt can be recovered when the relative dip between a borehole and a layered formation is greater than 85 degrees. The examples show that bed boundaries can be reproduced with sufficient accuracy by our approach, among others to define pay zone intervals. In addition, the resolution of the method was studied with models of different layer thicknesses and is discussed in details in the paper. As an outcome, the derived true Rt reads lower in a resistive thinner layer and reads slightly higher in a conductive thinner layer. A field example from a North Sea oil field demonstrates very promising and robust Rt results from the method. The inversion is fully automatic and can be used in real time and downhole. Physical constraints that are special to a horizontal well and better strategies make our algorithm robust and very fast.
机译:在水平井中,表观电阻率曲线通常显示出不同的分离和增加的值,因为偏振喇叭效应附近的偏振喇叭效应,例如相邻的床或各向异性。真正的形成电阻率(RT)是不确定的并且可以被解释。结果,饱和估计不确定,以便不能准确地预测储备。可以使用完整的反演来导出真正的RT。然而,由于沿着测量深度缺乏测量变化导致的反演的不稳定性使得RT推导非常具有挑战性。为了确定从钻孔(LWD)电阻率测量的真正RT,通常完全反转通常是耗时的,并且需要在形成模型上进行一些输入。本文提出了一种替代方法,无法在没有任何先前信息的情况下派生真正的RT。替代方法使用简单的两层模型来移除喇叭效应,并以两个步骤衍生一个解决方案:a)在远离边界的每个距离处的两个层的反转电阻。 b)选择具有特定约束的解决方案,例如在移动窗口中使用统计信息以及内部一致的物理约束,以使解决方案更可靠。在第一步中,开发了神经网络以计算用于节省计算时间和内存需求的工具响应和衍生物。合成实例表明,当钻孔和层状形成之间的相对浸渍大于85度时,可以回收真正的RT。这些例子表明,通过我们的方法可以通过足够的精度来再现床边界,等等来定义付费区域间隔。此外,用不同层厚度的模型研究了该方法的分辨率,并在纸张中详细讨论。作为结果,在电阻较薄层中达到的衍生真空读数,并且在导电较薄层中略高。来自北海油田的领域示例演示了该方法非常有前途和鲁棒的RT结果。反转是全自动的,可以实时和井下使用。横向井和更好的策略特别的物理限制使我们的算法强大而且非常快。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号